this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
76 points (95.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43138 readers
1620 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nowadays, most people use password managers (hopefully). However, there are still some passwords that you need to memorize, like master password (for a password manager), phone lock, wifi password, etc.

Security wise, can passphrase reach the strength of a good password without getting so long that it defeats the purpose of even using it?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (13 children)

can passphrase reach the strength of a good password

Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/936/

I’d love to hear from someone well versed in security if this is legit or significant weaknesses exist, but the math seems to check out as far as I can tell.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

For what a civilian target would worry about, using sufficiently long passwords is your best defense. Complexity is barely important.

111111111111111111111111111.1111 is an excellent password.

Everyone should Ctrl+f their password here. But also wait the 10 minutes it'll take to load the whole thing.

If your pw is on this list, change it immediately.

If it's less than 8 chars? Change immediately. If it's less than 10 chars? Change... Now.

If it's less than 14 chars, consider just making your password longer.

This advice will save more people in its simplicity than saying more.


Want a smidge more?

If you're paranoid, take a password that you think is decent, then insert it here, then use the output as your password.

Most times, pws aren't stored in plain text, they're stored using that algorithm. So, if your password is 'password', hackers night easily be able to see that your passwords encrypted value is exactly what that link will output if you put in 'password'. If your password is on that huge list from the beginning of the post, they can easily decrypt the encrypted password, because these passwords's hashes are known.

So, use the hash itself as a password.

Hell, throw a comma at the beginning to throw it off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

That's basically a Diceware passphrase. And, it's kinda ok. The amount of entropy is pretty significant (close to what the comic lists, if the Wikipedia article has it right). And it's really easy to add more entropy. I often recommend passphrases to my users (I work in Cybersecurity) and use them myself. Take a sentence, with spaces, capitals and punctuation. Now throw in a few numbers for fun and stop worrying about brute force attacks, until some idiot decides unsalted MD5 is perfectly fine for storing passwords. Most such passphrases will blow right past the 4 words in that comic and are very easy to remember. Even better, make that the passphrase for your password vault (oh look a plug for KeePass). Then have the rest of your passwords all be unique, 20 character jumbles of letters, numbers, and special characters.

Also, enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) wherever possible. Even if it's just a One Time Password (OTP) sent via SMS (which is a shit way to do 2FA), that's better than no 2FA.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My cybersecurity prof at uni showed us this xkcd during class lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

most people use password managers

You don’t know many boomers, do you?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Best I can find,

According to security.org survey data, in 2021, 22% of Americans said they used a password manager, but in 2023, the percentage increased to 34% with a further 10% of users saying they use a security passkey or other physical password device.

So in the most generous interpretation of that, just over half of people are not doing anything secure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I use passphrases for stuff like my password manager, my computer login, and my disk encryption. For my login (which I type a lot) it's four words; for occasional stuff like disk encryption it's six. I'm sold on the argument that a passphrase is way easier to memorize compared to a comparably-secure random password.

The number of possible passphrases is the number of words in the dictionary you use to generate passphrases raised to the power of the number of words in your passphrase (assuming a small chance of reusing the same word in a passphrase). I use this command to generate a random phrase using my stock OS word list:

grep -v '[^a-z]' $WORDLIST | shuf --random-source=/dev/urandom | head -n5 | paste -sd ' '

grep -v '[^a-z]' $WORDLIST filters out words with apostrophes or other weirdness. On my system the filtered list is 77,866 words.

For four words, 77,866 ^ 4 ≈ 3.7 × 10^19 possible passphrases.

Compare that to randomly-generated passwords. I'll assume that random lowercase & uppercase letters, numbers, and symbols add up to 46 characters. The number of combinations is 46^n where n is the length of the password. A four-word passphrase is the same order of magnitude as secure as a 12-character password, which has about 9 × 10^19 possible combinations.

I'm sure that if you make up your own passphrases instead of randomly generating them then the security is much lower.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Very similar heuristic here, insofar as when to use passphrases and how long.

LUKS and Bitlocker volumes get 8 words, computer logins usually get 4 words (potentially more depending on frequency/criticality of system).

Smartcards and mobile devices do have numeric pins due to frequency of use and relative difficulty in copying those for offline attacks.

Websites that are filled in w/ password manager get passwords get the random symbol-laden strings that 'meet requirements'

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

correct horse battery staple?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All I see is "****************************?"

What did you type?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you can go hunter2 my hunter2-ing hunter2

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

This guy hunts.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I found it amusing when the security team in my company sent me parts of my password in plaintext saying it was insecure (because it didn't have special characters in it) and recommended I use a password manager

The account is used for the ancient VPN software and all of our ssh management tools

And windows login if you're using windows.

Yeah good luck using a randomly generated password that you have to type in multiple times everyday

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Isn't the bigger issue here that they can see the plaintext password?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah I actually gave them shit about it and they just handwaved it away

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The account is used for the ancient VPN software and all of our ssh management tools

And windows login if you’re using windows.

If you're using one password for all those things, you're doing it wrong. Even if the passphrases you pick are easy to remember and type, they should be distinct.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If it’s one “account” then it likely has only one password.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I made a passphrase for my laptop in bitwarden and didn't think I'd remember the 10 word passphrase but after a few days of typing it I now remember it. All other alphanumeric passwords I would need a keyboard in order to type it out if I remember

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I use passphrases for frequently used logins and randomly-generated passwords of varying lengths for everything else. I also use a hardware key and/or 2FA for everything that allows it.

I'm conversationally fluent in a few different languages (enough to order food, greet people and ask directions to the shitter, anyway) and I can swear in another half-dozen languages so I tend to mix'n'match my passphrases with different foreign words. Bonus points for accented characters. That's probably not gonna fool a dictionary-based attack but since I live in a (mostly) English-speaking country, it might make it interesting for the English-only speakers to try guessing.

At work, we're held to the outdated policy set by the IT department so it can be difficult to be creative. On top of that, they force a password change whenever someone sneezes so I see a lot of sticky notes on monitors and under keyboards.

Edit: spelling and grammar.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I once had to change a password every 30 days.

And it couldn't be a password I'd used before. Along with ridiculous requirements (but not as ridiculous as the 30 day thing).

You'd think it was a password to get into the NSA's database or something.

Nope, just a (not very) random website.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I do. It's worth it because there are some sites that are so outdated that their version of security is to not allow pasting (or filling in via pw manager) on password fields, so I have to manually type them in. Typing in a passphrase is easier and faster than a random string.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I use an open source password manager and long random passwords for most things.

my master password is a long phrase though, as well as any I have to type personally sometimes. passphrases are so much easier to type as well

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Ok, this is a reasonable community to ask. What's a FOSS pword manager that is easy to use, reliable, likely to be around and working in 5 years, and won't leave me feeling shit up a creek if my phone dies or I'm using a public terminal with software installation restrictions? Been a few years, but I had not found something that worked well for me.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or if you want to selfhost, use Vaultwarden (compatible with Bitwarden official clients)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

this, just works and very easy to use and backup if using docker.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

What's a FOSS pword manager

There are probably more that these two out there but the two I know of that fit this bill are Bitwarden and KeePass. The latter comes in two flavors, the original KeePass that kinda looks like shit and tries to stay lean and defer niche features to plugins, and the fork KeePassXC that tries to give it a sleeker UX with more features natively baked-in. I will refer to both simply as "KeePass" for the rest of this comment.

that is easy to use

"Easy to use" is relative. If you're savvy enough to know what FOSS software even is, to care about using it, and to find your way onto an experimental platform like Lemmy to ask about it, I'd say youre more than capable of handling either of the above choices with ease.

reliable, likely to be around and working in 5 years

I'd wager that on both Bitwarden and KeePass.

and won't leave me feeling shit up a creek if my phone dies or I'm using a public terminal with software installation restrictions

Bitwarden offers free cloud hosting and a web interface. As long as you have access to a browser and an Internet connection, you have access to your Bitwarden key store.

KeePass is offline-only and requires specialized client software to read its key store file format. Though, since all it is is a file, you can use simple and straightforward methods to make it accessible wherever you need it. Copy it to a flash drive. SCP it between devices. Put it on a cloud service like Dropbox. You have options. It's just up to you to use them.

Bitwarden also lets you save locally stored files and manage them like KeePass, if you're into that.

Honestly, since each can be made to more or less behave like the other, which one you pick largely comes down to taste. Bitwarden is more turn-key if you want cloud hosting, KeePass makes you work for it. Bitwarden is a company providing a premium service you can buy, while KeePass is a completely free project funded only by good will donations.

I prefer KeePassXC, personally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sure. You can either increase the dictionary of possible words, or increase the number of words or both. Eventually it will become unwieldy. I don't bother with passphrases though.

I generate passwords of sufficient entropy (random ASCII), store them securely (encrypted, key memorized, on dedicated hardware), and never re-use them. I don't trust password managers unless open-source. I don't need convenience -- to some extent, it's my job to manage other people's secrets. Since I'm being paid, no need for shortcuts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Same. Pass phrases seem like a solution to a problem that doesn't exist anymore. We don't live in a world where people should be reusing and memorizing strong passwords. We live in a world with frequent user data theft and scams to glean your login info. Just last week, I started getting random login attempts from around the world for a Microsoft account I haven't used in over a decade. No idea when or how that info got leaked.

And people aren't equipped to memorize a different passphrase for all 30 of their accounts.

So, we should do what we always do: Get machines to make the issue easier for us to manage. Right now, that means password managers with a strong master password and secure storage.

In the future, maybe we'll have some kind of creepy central government ID based password-less login method. Who knows?

Edit: Besides, most services require ThIrTeEn dIgIt lOnG PaSsWoRdS WiTh fIvE SpEcIaL ChArAcTeRs aNd sIx nOn-cOnSeCuTiVe dIgItS Of pI ThAt dOeSn't mAtCh aNy kNoWn dAtE Or eVeNt oR SpEcIaL StRiNg oF NuMbErS. It's just too annoying, and I'd have to memorize all the special characters in addition to the phrase.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

OP kinda already addressed that. A password manager is great, but you still need a master password, so do you use a passphrase for that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I hate that. Forcing me to input special characters makes my password slightly less secure. Of course I'll include them by default, but now an attacker can eliminate all passwords without special characters. Most people just put the number 1 or a period at the end of their existing, frequently re-used password anyway. Or capitalize the first or last letter. So it doesn't make it really harder to crack dumb passwords.

It's like we've optimized passwords to be hard for humans to remember, but easy for humans to guess!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For my personal life I use a password manager, like most people in this thread. For my master password I really want a secure password (LastPass really reinforced the value of that), so I use a passphrase that is then hashed using an algorithm I can do in my head, so it's a long string of high entropy alphanumeric gibberish that I can remember easily.

At work my IT dept seems to be stuck 10 years in the past, so they have now implemented a policy that our passwords must be at least 16 characters. They keep ignoring my suggestions to get some form of corporate password manager, so I have my work passwords stored in a text file that I'm not allowed to have any form of file encryption so it just sits there in my documents folder. It's probably not going to be the source of our company getting penetrated, but I don't consider it secure.

I do like pass phrases because I find them easy to remember, but my current prime work one is really easy to make typos, so I now use the reveal password button more than I ever have before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

https://bitwarden.com/password-strength/

Test it here. Passphrases of 3 words take centuries to crack, without any numbers or capital letters. Passwords with numbers, capital letters, and symbols need ~14 characters to be that secure. If you need to memorize it, a passphrase is far superior. Add in a number, or random capitalization, or a misspelling and your security goes even higher.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One caveat I'd want to note is for the underlying methodology that uses:

As this study by Joseph Bonneau attests, people frequently choose common phrases in addition to common words. zxcvbn would be better if it recognized "Harry Potter" as a common phrase, rather than a semi-common name and surname. Google's n-gram corpus fits in a terabyte, and even a good bigram list is impractical to download browser-side, so this functionality would require server-side evaluation and infrastructure cost. Server-side evaluation would also allow a much larger single-word dictionary, such as Google's unigram set.

As another example, the passphrase "This password is good" is claimed to take centuries to crack, but if the search space were narrowed down from a sequence of words to grammatically correct sentences, certain passphrases would be much weaker than this would show.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

All my manual passwords are passphrases.

This is basically based on the idea that if the password is so strong I can no longer input it, it has no inherent value anyways. A phrase makes it easier to use entire sentences as a password and readily recall them.

Of course, these are but a minority, the rest are passkeys or passwords a manager will fill in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I do use passphrases, but I combine with randomness.

I memorize one random 8 character string to use with something more memorable.

Then when I need more security, or I feel that random 8 character string is no longer safe (password leak/hacked), I memorize a new 8 character string.

Then I combine them.

Then I memorize a new 8 character string and mix it in.

It's a process built up over years that ingrains into memory. Sometimes I forget the order, or if i added spaces, or did no spaces. Luckily, as long as I am sure of the discrete segments, I can remix them to recreate until it works (in a reasonable time).

My last addition was when I made the move from Lastpass to another password manager, after their endless bad news.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Disk encryption, computer login, and password manager are pass phrase + random characters stored on a pin protected OnlyKey and/or Mooltipass.

Regular passwords are just random characters up to min(max_len, 128).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I use a passphrase in order to get into my password manager, but that's it. Because my password manager handles all the rest of them and makes it way more random than I could ever dream of.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I'm a big car guy so I typically use car makes and models but never ones I actually own, usually I'll go with some like SubaruImprezaWrxSti2012 except I scramble the order of the words and throw the year in a random position. This is really easy to remember while also being long and insane enough to be difficult to guess.

load more comments
view more: next ›