this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
167 points (94.2% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4585 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is what happens when you fail to prosecute in a timely fashion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Justice for the wealthy!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Who would have guessed garland would be a terrible pick for SC and AG. Well done Biden

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Considering that the whole reason Garland was nominated for the Supreme Court in the first place was that he was so conservative Obama figured the Republicans had no excuse to object to him, I sure as Hell did guess that!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, now go and vote for trump!

Oh wait...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

We can't be sad/disappointed in Bidens terrible decisions? I hope he doesn't keep garland in his next term

[–] [email protected] 42 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bomb threat

Now that I have the DOJ's attention: Do us all a favour and tell Garland that this is his fucking fault for not accelerating this shit into court with the pedal to the metal immediately after Biden took office.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

The first year, I was like, "They need to shore up their prosecution."

The second year, "Probably waiting until next year, so not to cause an issue during an election year."

The third year, "Come on....do something. Anything. Charge him for littering..."

The fourth year, "It's not happening. Not when he's running for office."

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago

It was his bid to get it in 2020, too.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They had 4 fucking years to get this little bitch ass loser in a jail cell with a misfitting orange jumpsuit. This is such a slap in the face of all of us peasants.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

And now there's not enough time to do anything, even if he admitted all of it and provided evidence

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago

Americans have a hard time understanding that what happens in most of the world can happen here, too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


At a weekend rally in Ohio, his first as the presumed Republican Party presidential nominee, Trump stood onstage, his hand raised in salute to the brim of his red MAGA hat, as a recorded chorus of prisoners in jail for their roles in the Jan. 6 attack sang the national anthem.

Initially relegated to a fringe theory on the edges of the Republican Party, the revisionist history of Jan. 6, which Trump amplified during the early days of the GOP primary campaign to rouse his most devoted voters, remains a rally centerpiece even as he must appeal more broadly to a general election audience.

In heaping praise on the rioters, Trump is shifting blame for his own role in the run-up to the bloody mob siege and asking voters to absolve hundreds of them — and himself — over the deadliest attack on a seat of American power in 200 years.

Republicans in Congress are embarking on a re-investigation of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack that seeks to shield Trump of wrongdoing while lawmakers are showcasing side theories about why thousands of his supporters descended on Capitol Hill in what became a brutal scene of hand-to-hand combat with police.

Trump is facing a four-count federal indictment over Jan. 6 — charges he conspired to defraud Americans over his 2020 election defeat and obstructed the official proceeding in Congress to certify the vote for Joe Biden.

The initial House Select Committee on Jan. 6 found that Trump criminally engaged in a “multi-part conspiracy” to overturn the lawful results of the 2020 presidential election and failed to act to stop his supporters from attacking the Capitol and beating police.


The original article contains 1,118 words, the summary contains 277 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

If Trump wins the election this year, it's going to be the last election for President we ever have.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

So now he’s taking credit for/working with Antifa?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Even if he loses again, won’t he just run again in 2028 if he is still alive?