Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
The Italics were inserted to appeal to the average Italian who would otherwise be too busy drinking olive oil and spinning pizza dough in the air to read it.
But with Italics in the mix?
"Mama mia, Giuseppe, come-a ova here and read-a this book abouta socialismo, and some-a of the words are a-leaning like the Tower of Pisa"
Anyway, this is ultimately what led to Gladio. Too many Italians were leaning into Marxist Leninism due to italics.
I blame that they lived before emojis
they could've still drawn some communists fighting snails on the margin... or communist snails fighting fascists, i dont care.
Most ebook formats can have styling removed/hidden, which sounds like it should alleviate this.
Maybe it was to combat all the paragraph-long run-on sentences. I mean when you are making forty points of impact, before you end the sentence, the comma,,,, can only get you so far.
Bad translators tbh. In German that kind of structure is normal but a good translator would translate the structure into English norms, not just the words into English words.
Then again, reading German philosophy wouldn’t be the same if you didn’t have to stop and catch your breath between each sentence.
no u 
Wdym?
How does it make them unreadable?
for comparison: over-emphasizing every other word kills the natural flow of reading something yourself (and makes it seem like the writer is talking down to the reader). italics can be helpful for understanding what exactly an author is trying to say by emphasizing a certain word, but when you start forcing emphasis on every other word, and you're doing it every sentence, reading the entire essay/book becomes unnecessarily arduous. I literally cannot read much of Lenin's work, because it reads like a condescending reddit post. when I can find his writing with all the heavy-handed emphasis removed, it reads a lot more naturally.
Oh... I see... the italics kinda throws me off a bit
it's like the weird random bolding in MAD magazine stuff...
over-emphasizing every other word kills the natural flow of reading something yourself (and makes it seem like the writer is talking down to the reader). italics can be helpful for understanding what exactly an author is trying to say by emphasizing a certain word, but when you start forcing emphasis on every other word, and you're doing it every sentence, reading the entire essay/book becomes unnecessarily arduous. I literally cannot read much of Lenin's work because it reads like a condescending reddit post. when I can find his writing with all the heavy-handed emphasis removed, it reads a lot more naturally.
e: sorry i responded so late to this comment, its a good question
I love using italics. Lenin and I would fucking hate eachother.