You motherfuckers haven't done shit about Jared Kushner recieving 2 billions from the Saudis. When the fuck is that happening?
this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
358 points (98.9% liked)
politics
18651 readers
3565 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They need to find an action by Kushner, while in position, that directly benefited the Saudis before they can charge him. We all know of the compensation, so I’m assuming they haven’t found the “quid” in the quid pro quo yet.
It’s probably all those missing top secret files. But Trumps judge is never gonna let that see the light of day.
Even without the "quid" he was the former Senior Advisor who accepted foreign cash. That should scream red flags alone.
It already has. Accepting money after leaving office is not a crime on its own. I’m not saying he’s innocent, just that they need proof of a crime to charge him.
Most def. I just guess I'm frustrated that this shit weasel has been getting away with this for all this time.
With a built in exception for AIPAC. This is nothing but some and mirrors, if Democrats were serious they would have used the Emoluments Clause when they tried to impeach him
Yup. If you want no foreign money interests in your elections, then make it so. But if you pick and choose which countries can lobby and which countries "interfere" just based on who you like today, it's stupid.
In case you wanted to know: From the Congressional Research Service: The Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/if/if11086
This podcast gives a great overview in an accessible manner and the context of what Trump did
yeah the rest of the headline should be "except the ones they like."
AIPAC Takes zero money from the Israeli government. there's a massive difference between getting legal campaign donations from a PAC that gets it's money from American citizens, and what Trump did.
its stupid this isnt a law already
Can't wait to see the Republicans stammer trying to explain why they voted no on this one
Thats easy, they just wont. The press aint gonna press them about it or anything
I'm sure they'll claim it's some sort of freedom of speech violation or some bs that their base will eat up.
No, their “news” outlets just don’t cover it. They keep busy with fear lingering about anti-woke, cancel cultures, and Chinese immigrants in the Darian gap.
You might be surprised how many Dems push back on this too. Still pisses me off how Pelosi wouldn't support banning stock trades.
Yeah, every once in a while I'm reminded that even the generally good side does shitty things. I want to be excited to vote for people, not be required to do it to prevent an apocalypse. This sucks.
Ban gifts and job offers too. In fact, let's make force any and all politicians to live on nothing but a pension forever, remove any incentive for corrupt people to be there
On today's episode of "wtf, isn't that already illegal? "