this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
277 points (98.3% liked)

Today I Learned

17265 readers
688 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It was purportedly (and probably in actuality) intended as a survival aid to be used after landings and before recovery in the Siberian wilderness, although allegedly was intended as a defensive weapon against in-space attacks by the US space program.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The attack in space angle was probably just to convince some manager.

The survival in Siberia is completely valid. US retrieves their astronauts in the ocean, but Soviet Russia didn't/doesn't have such a worldwide navy, so Siberia it is. It could take days for the cosmonauts to be recovered, so it was expected they might need to defend themselves against wildlife or even hunt.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I think every astronaut that embarked in the Soyuz spacecraft had to go through a wilderness survival training.

I know the french astronaut Thomas Pesquet had to survive a week in Siberian first in winter before embarking on the Soyuz.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because space is haunted. And buckshot's superior spread helps ensure a hit while spinning around in zero-g. Solid slugs would go straight through the soyuz walls, duh.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's the sequel we've always wanted to Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.

As long as it's about Buzz Aldrin and they're Nazi ghosts.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

allegedly was intended as a defensive weapon against in-space attacks by the US space program.

??? If it was for in-space attacks, wouldn't it be more logical to mount a gun outside of ship 😆?

It was intended as a survival aid for emergency landings. It's not a shotgun, but a three barrel pistol (but it can shoot both normal rounds and shells). Another interesting detail - it's buttstock is a folding machete.

TP-87 was invented by request of A. Leonov after emergency landing of 'Voshod-2' where cosmonauts Leonov and Belyaev had to survive 3 days in wild taiga forest for a rescue team to retrieve them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Love that story. Reminds me of Factorio, or Satisfactory or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Satisfactorio ?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would this actually work effectively in space?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Why wouldn't it?

Ed: the only thing that might not work is gunpowder in vacuum due to lack of oxygen, but gunpowder has oxidiser included, so yes it would.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had to look up whether gunpowder requires oxygen to burn (it doesn't)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gunpowder does actually require oxygen to burn, it just happens to bring its own oxygen with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's what I assumed, but why ass-ume when I live in the information age 😁

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

if it needed oxygen from the air it would have to breathe, the explosion happens inside the barrel before it mixes with the atmosphere

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah! This is true and more precise

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Heat dissipation is an issue since there's no air around to cool the barrel, although for this three shot weapon (two shotgun one rifle) it wouldn't be a problem. This gun is mostly to fend off bears when you land in Siberia.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are half right. The gun definitely is for bears, but, and get this, space bears

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Normal or cocaine....space...bears?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Miniature giant space bears.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Recoil would be a removed though lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, I guess? But firing a gun inside a spacecraft would be a bad idea... and also firing it while spacewalking would be a bad idea unless you were very sure that you were very well braced & tethered.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or the gun is just an emergency propulsion system in case you lose your tether....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Crazy enough plan to be Russian.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You could load it with very small, light, or soft pellets, they don't need to be very damaging to make a hole in a suit which would be near certainly fatal.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, considering that many early spacecraft and space stations were running oxygen rich atmospheres, it would probably mean the end of anyone involved in a rather spectacular fireball.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'd kind of hope everyone would know better than that after the disastrous Apollo I fire.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Long-time space journalist Jim Oberg called it “a deluxe all-in-one weapon with three barrels and a folding stock that doubles as a shovel and contains a swing-out machete.”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You'd think it was invented by the Swiss.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It could also be a handy final solution if you got trapped in space with no chance of rescue or return.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They say it was because their landing in the wilds of Siberia may require defense against wildlife. This is not true. The truth is that they have seen what resides in space, and would not venture into it's laid unarmed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So... They watched Aliens?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Possibly also for suicide if you get into a situation where you would slowly suffer to death?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather take hypoxia atleast then it not technically suicide.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

A gunshot wound to the head is also not suicide.

If however both the gunshot wound and hypoxia are self inflicted then it is suicide, regardless if you pull the trigger or open a valve.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can't seem to read the article, so forgive me if they answer this question, but how would a gun work in space? Most firearms I'm familiar with use oxidation reactions to propel ammunition. Were the shells filled with self-oxidizing propellant, or did they just use a completely different system?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fun fact! All gunpowder is self oxidizing

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess today is a learning day for all of us! I knew gunpowder contained nitrates, but I didn't realize that was its purpose, or that it allowed it to work in a vacuum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

basically all explosives are fuel combined with it's own oxidizer

[–] Cethin 7 points 1 year ago

Pretty much anything explosive need to be self oxidizing. If air can't get in to continue to feed the burning of the material (which never can during an explosion) than the oxygen needs to come from another source.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They were called spacial operations.