403
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

New York’s top court on Tuesday declined to hear Donald Trump’s gag order appeal in his hush money case, leaving the restrictions in place following his felony conviction last month. The Court of Appeals found that the order does not raise “substantial” constitutional issues that would warrant an immediate intervention.

The decision is the latest legal setback for the Republican former president, who has repeatedly railed against the gag order, which prevents him from commenting on witnesses, jurors and others who were involved in the case. But it could be short lived. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, is expected to rule soon on a defense request to lift the gag order.

Trump’s attorneys filed a notice of appeal with the state’s high court on May 15, during the former president’s landmark criminal trial. They argued that the gag order restricted Trump’s “core political speech on matters of central importance at the height of his Presidential campaign.”

But the Court of Appeals disagreed. In a decision list posted on Tuesday, the court said it would not automatically hear the case, writing that “no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.”

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 69 points 3 weeks ago

If Merchan lifts the gag order before sentencing, Trump will immediately give all the justification for a harsh sentencing.

[-] [email protected] 54 points 3 weeks ago

If Merchan doesn't lift the gag order before sentencing, Trump may still give all the justification for a harsh sentencing. 😂

[-] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

Trump has already given the justification for a harsh sentencing.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

He's already doing that by repeatedly violating it.

He's shown such contempt (in both the legal and colloquial sense of the word) for the proceedings and hangs out with so many other convicted criminals on a daily basis that probation is more or less out of the question.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

When is he due to be sentenced?

[-] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Can they appeal after sentencing, does that have to come before?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They've already appealed and the court didn't see enough to justify an appeal. So that appeal was declined. Thats what the OP article is about. Sentencing doesn't stop or interfere with the appeal process.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

No they will still appeal the conviction. This was an appeal on the gag order.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Neither can I lol

[-] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

You can't multiply by zero

[-] [email protected] 53 points 3 weeks ago

lol i hope he has a coronary.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

When he is in hell all his poops will be large cubes with sharp hard corners.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Let me introduce you to wombat poop. Go ahead and google that.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Those are a more relaxed sort of cube, though. Not that sharp and presumably not terribly hard either.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Not what I needed first thing in the morning, but thanks. Now I am. 😄

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
403 points (99.0% liked)

News

21860 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS