189
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 69 points 2 weeks ago

Now those salmon fishermen (who didn't even have to pay the $700 fee to monitor their amount they catch that this lawsuit was about) can decimate their fishing spot and subject all of us to unsafe workplaces, dumping of chemicals into water supplies and pollution of the air we breathe.

[-] [email protected] 62 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is so far beyond salmon fishing. This is going to weaken every executive agency we have severely. Congress is broken and they're never going to give piecemeal explicit authority to these agencies for comprehensive work. The EPA, the FTC, the FCC, the SEC, the ATF. They're all damaged and weakened by today's ruling and thus so is our environment, our economy, our utilities, and our regulations. This was the conservative wet dream ruling above almost any other this session. This was the Dobbs-style meat thrown to the educated, more lawful evil Republicans.

Please vote, so we can nominate justices to the Supreme Court. Please help us add another Sotomayor or Jackson instead of an Alito, Thomas, or at this rate, Cannon. Not feeling hopeful right now, but I have to ask.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago

Every election for the rest of our lives is the most important election of our lives. Don't ever forget what has been done. Vote like your life and the world depend on it because frankly, they do. If you want another generation to grow up even close to the same quality of life we've had, it is critical to recognize that one party has been actively rolling back protective legislation over and over again against the better interest of the people of thos country and the world. Its absolutely disgusting.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Every election for the rest of our lives is the most important election of our lives.

I agree but it's getting fucking exhausting.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Given the urgency of our predicament, wouldn't you say it would be wise to use every tool at our disposal to maintain our democracy?

What if we tried using a voting system that wasn't first past the post voting? That way, more then 2 political parties would be viable and there would be no spoiler effect.

Imagine several other people on that debate stage. Then it wouldn't be such a knife in the gut to see a poor performance coming from Joe biden. There would be other people to back. Other people to compete for the office. Other people to not let trump get away with his bullshit.

How we vote is controlled at the state level, we dont need to wait for federal reform! In fact some states have already passed electoral reform.

Here is an example of what Ranked Choice voting can do for us all:

https://www.newsweek.com/how-sarah-palin-was-thwarted-alaska-election-ranked-choice-voting-1738792

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone here wants ranked choice. It's just not simple to pass. I do highly recommend that those who are able should push for a ballot initiative in their state and/or campaign for the issue. Do you have any links or resources for those who might be looking to get engaged further in those state-level efforts?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Made up example.

The FAA was only legally allowed to regulate propeller based airplanes under 50 feet! The law never specified newer larger planes, or new technology like jet engines or helicopters! They didn't even exist when the law was made! None of their saftey rules apply to these vehicles!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

It's going to be a real spectacle watching what happens to these agencies. This is going to open the floodgates for SCOTUS cases. They're gonna be mighty busy dismantling it all next year.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

You just know they're going to have lawyers combing over every single word in the relevant laws so they can squeak past the common meaning into an area of ambiguity and say fuck you to the FAA.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago

The death of humanity will not be a bomb but a flick of the pen.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Or the bang of a gavel

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

It'll most likely be both

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

F Trump and his stupid ass appointees.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

We'll see what the supreme court has to say about that.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately, it looks like there's great risk of another four years of orange joy.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

...fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe American legislators should pass some fucking laws instead of relying on the decisions of 9 unelected judges. They had decades to codify chevron into law, but they didn't. Womp womp.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

As long as Republicans hold any amount of power in any branch of government, absolutely nothing can get passed. They need to be purged from government first.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Legislating? Not when Republicans have a hold on the house, or the Senate.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
189 points (99.5% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS