The GOP finally got what they’ve been trying to get since the 80s. Get ready for The Jungle 2.0.

The GOP wanted Chevron in the 80s. It was a way of tweaking laws passed already without legislative resistance.

In 1981, after Ronald Reagan became President, the EPA changed its interpretation of the word "source" in the law to mean only an entire plant or factory, not an individual building or machine.

The goal is for regulations to be held up via congressional deadlock by the obstructionist party. Can't make a good or bad decision if you can't make a decision at all.

Things seemed to be going alright before the Reagan wanted to clarify the language of the Clean Air Act. The Congressional Research Services kinda cover this issue already.

The decision actually actually mentioned stare decisis on cases decided on the basis of Chevron:

The holdings of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful—including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself—are still subject to statutory stare decisis despite the Court’s change in interpretive methodology. See CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries, 553 U. S. 442, 457. Mere reliance on Chevron cannot constitute a “ ‘special justification’ ” for overrulingsuch a holding.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf

Dred Scott?

Sometimes precedent is plain wrong.

ETA: not in this instance though. This was a time they should have respected precedent.

YOLO court strikes again

Yes, but they never followed that shit to begin with.

Yes

Removing the filibuster so those things can be accomplished even if the Republicans have 41 Senators will also be necessary. That is what led to the minor improvements in the ACA instead of actually implementing something better like single payer healthcare.

The Senate map is basically impossible this cycle.

no, because they're the supreme court, and they're appointed for life.

No, because Biden doesn't have the balls to put forward more justices. And yes, he could.

I think it's for when the law is considered vague, they don't rely on the "experts" in these positions to give an answer they let the SCOTUS decide now.

What project 2025 would want to do is ensure the day to day operations are kept in a "business friendly" manner too so if they control both I guess it's just more ways for them to get what they want. :(

No it was pure corruption the way it was. Congress is supposed to write the laws, and the Judicial Branch is supposed to interpret those laws, not the unelected federal bureaucracy.

I hear the mafia is looking for pizza delivery drivers.