62
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago

Obligatory Map Men: https://youtu.be/hrsxRJdwfM0

Afroeurasia is a continent. The only thing separating Africa from Asia is the Suez canal which is manmade.

Same goes for the Americas - the Panama canal is manmade.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Pangaea is the only continent!

[-] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

it's just asia. europe's just a subregion in the northwest of asia.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

Europe and India are Asian subcontinents. The only reason Europe is considered a full continent is white people made the definitions.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

they made the definitions before they'd invented white people though. IIRC this nomenclature comes from the ancient greeks. it's very ancient european cope.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

the names and boundaries of continents are arbitrary and don't matter. that said, the most common definition, really more of a vibe, of a continent is size. Europe is 3 times larger than India. It's twice as large as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and Afghanistan combined.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Bold move including Russia as part of Europe considering how the europeans have been acting (without western russia europe is 2x the size of India).

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't think Europe or the West as a geopolitical force is the same as the continent. There are other areas that are unambiguously in Europe that aren't part of "Europe" similarly to how Russia isn't. Are Belarus, Bosnia, Serbia, or Moldova really part of the club the way France and Germany are? Of course not. Greece or Hungary arguably aren't either.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Greece or Hungary arguably aren't either.

not gonna argue that, greece relative to europe occupies the position of peurto rico relative to the US.

I just think that the self-concept of europe is chauvinist and it's more of desired boundary than anything real, and calling it 'a continent' gives it legitimacy that it does not deserve.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Every continental boundary is more of a desired boundary than anything real. There are no "real" continents.

I can't disagree with wanting to delegimitize it

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

I was under the impression that continent boundaries were defined by tectonic plates. Is that not correct?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

There's way more tectonic plates than continents and a lot of landmasses we think of as contiguous are on different plates. Itd be very impractical to try to make them the same. Iceland would be a transcontinental country, California would be its own continent, Asia would be several continents, there would be continents that are just patches of the Pacific Ocean or the Caribbean, and so on

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

The European subcontinent.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago
[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

It's a bit offensive to associate Asia, such a wonderful continent with those barbaric savages in its western peninsula.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

While we’re at it, we may as well make it 4 continents: Afro-Eurasia, the Americas, Australia, and Antarctica. I think there’s even an argument for combining Afro-Eurasia and the Americas too, since it’s just one big contiguous landmass during ice ages. This has important biological consequences for the historic exchange of humans and other animals via Beringia. It also makes it easier to understand the close linguistic and genetic relationships between Siberian peoples and Native Americans. I hope you have enjoyed this argument for why a 3 continent world mental model is good, actually

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Why stop there? After we rule 85% of the world's land area to belong to just one continent, why split the remaining 15% of Earth's land in two? That seems awfully imbalanced to me. So I rule that we should just merge Oceania and Antarctica together into the great continent of "Antherest" — after all, the Maori were quite likely the first people to discover Antarctica; Antarctica itself is just an archipelago with the appearance of a contiguous landmass due to its ice (which might not last); and there aren't really any people on Antarctica to object to being merged with Oceania.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

West Asian Peninsula

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Actually it's Afro-Eurasia.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

it's europe when it's not attached. when moored, it's euline

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

1984 We've always been at war with Eurasia.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

ha! it’s myasia now, no backsies

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

You're sooooo smart

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

honestly the eur part of eurasia is too good for the "europeans", the continient they live on is called asia

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
62 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13310 readers
925 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS