155
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 41 points 3 days ago

Can I help you, smoothskin?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

I don't think we should be poking fun solely on his appearance. Walking flesh turd maybe?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If you attack people based on immutable characteristics, then your fucked up, melted face is fair game. Don't throw stones in a glass house and all that.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Guy survives an IED and this is what he decides to do with his second lease on life

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Oh. I thought it was image artifacting.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

Thing is, these people will not be satisfied with "only" coming after a certain subset of citizens, by the way.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

I think terms like "extremist" and "anti-LGBTQ+" are superfluous when we're talking about a Republican.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago

It wasn't always like that. Parties can change for the worse or for the better.

I don't know if permanently branding an entire party as bigoted is wise, especially if the bigotry hasn't yet been made into a party platform or long term formal doctrine.

Also, MAGA has become more diverse. We need to be careful not to overdo identity politics. A dignified and universal living standard floor should be our main focus, in my opinion. Healthcare as a right. Housing as a right. Those are the bread and butter issues that impact every identity and are amenable to broad coalitions. Housing as a right is good for LGBTQ+ and it's good for white male cisgenders too. I don't want to deal with the "gays for MAGA" type stuff, which is what will happen if we overemphasize id politics. Well, the log cabin Republicans are already a thing. Are you OK with fascism as long as all the identities are well represented in a reich? I am not.

If we push the Republicans on being bigots, they will give up their bigotry eventually because the main agenda of the Republicans is unfettered business freedom for the biggest businesses and the biggest business owners. It's why the corporations have readily embraced diversity but not higher taxes and more regulations.

I think we should call out bigotry without making bigotry the only or the main GOP sin while attempting to permanently marry the GOP brand to bigotry.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I'm sure there were nice Nazis too. The Republican platform is based on racism, homophobia, transphobia, and a disdain for democracy. Short of explicitly campaigning on returning the party to sanity, and even then I have suspicions, running as a Republican is an implied agreement with their hate-filled platform.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I liked her song “Stop”. It’s a pity she went fascist.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I loved his sketch comedy. When did it all go south?

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
155 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18080 readers
3770 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS