192

‘Stealing with both hands’: veteran reporter Joe Conason details the right wing’s graft (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago

“They didn’t own the liberals. They owned the conservatives. They stole this money from their own constituency. And Bannon, having promised that he would not take any money, did the same thing.“

And that’s the reptilian genius of these guys. It’s much easier to fool someone than to convince someone they’ve been fooled. By taking fools’ money, the fools now have skin in the game. It will eventually turn around on them though, because it always does. I just hope it happens soon enough.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

It will eventually turn around on them though, because it always does

I wish I shared your optimism. These extremist movements have a way of calcifying into basically a new religion. The warning signs are already plentiful.

The real issue for the MAGA cult is going to be succession. Trump can’t live forever, and it’s unclear whether his supporters can rally behind someone else.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I have absolutely no doubt they’ll find someone just as detestable, if not more.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I would find it funny if the vast majority of my family weren't conservatives, who I just know donated to these scammers.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

So said Joe Conason, veteran reporter and author of a lacerating new book, The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers, and Frauds Hijacked American Conservatism.

On the page, Conason charts 75 years of rightwing rip-off merchants attacking liberals and making money.

Asked to name prominent conservatives unstained by grift and swindle, he points to the Never Trumpers, “a bunch who I was once very critical of and vice versa.

Conason said: “You know they’re good people because they’ve made really big sacrifices to take a stand against this dishonesty and this threat to constitutional order.

Conason “exposed Conway on the front page of the [New York] Observer when he was acting as a secret lawyer for [Clinton accuser] Paula Jones in 1998.

And I believe I embarrassed him because he was a lawyer at a Democratic law firm in New York but they didn’t know he was secretly working to take down Bill Clinton.

The original article contains 1,009 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024

192 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18138 readers

3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News