236
Has anyone checked on ozma?
The accounts on social media platform X have since been banned.
Ah dang, it was just focused on Twitter. Nevermind.
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
236 points (99.2% liked)
politics
18651 readers
4072 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I blocked that Russian troll awhile ago and my feed is so much better for it. There’s a couple of em that I did the same to and I haven’t missed anything.
Yogthos
This is a good start. How about going after Russian payments to GOP politicians too?
So how would they manage to prosecute anyone if Russia goes in and buys shares of Truth Social (Trump Media Group) and keeps shoring up the price when Trump starts dumping shares after his moratorium runs out?
I'm trying to figure how this scam gets punished.
The U.S Justice Department said on Tuesday that it disrupted a Russian operation that used fake social media accounts enhanced by artificial intelligence to covertly spread pro-Kremlin messages in the United States and abroad.
…
The Justice Department secured court approval to seize two domain names and search nearly 1,000 social media accounts allegedly associated with the effort.
The accounts on social media platform X have since been banned.
Figures it's Xitter.
I'm seeing another paragraph between those two now, might have been updated after you posted this but the full quote is
The U.S Justice Department said on Tuesday that it disrupted a Russian operation that used fake social media accounts enhanced by artificial intelligence to covertly spread pro-Kremlin messages in the United States and abroad.
The news comes four months before the U.S. presidential election, which security experts widely believe will be the target of both hacking and covert social media influence attempts by foreign adversaries. Senior U.S. officials have said publicly they are monitoring for schemes intended to disrupt the vote.
The Justice Department secured court approval to seize two domain names and search nearly 1,000 social media accounts allegedly associated with the effort.
I forgot to add the ellipsis. Fixed.
Fair enough, it was definitely background information that I can understand omitting, but making it clear it was omitted (especially when it's coming from a source that some users won't be able to access) is important imo
Thank you for updating!
agreed
Ah so fox news was taken off the air for being a Russian talking piece?
Disrupted the trump campaign u say?
Fox News is down?
Just one?
Like I'm gonna trust a *Bing generated article!
*The authors last name is Bing
Mirror link for anyone stuck on the wrong side of a paywall or cookie wall or whatever Reuters' problem is - https://ghostarchive.org/archive/wUllP
Is that why there are fewer porn bots now?
I wonder if we'll see less traffic here
I wonder if centrists will ever stop feigning McCarthyist paranoia as an end-run around having defensible positions.