this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
372 points (97.2% liked)

News

22838 readers
3789 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 172 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Didn't he tell them to "go fuck themselves?" 🤔

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He did and how he's suprised I guess

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Poor Mr. Perfume he must REALLY need the money...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Gambit? Masterful. Car door? Slammed. Dick? Fully inside car door. 12-D chess? Played. Same time tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Look at Mr. "Multple dicks to slam into car doors" over here 😆

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was gonna say doors probably won't chop a dick completely off, but if it's a cyber truck all bets are off.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I had almost forgotten about that "finger chop" feature on them...those videos are nightmare fuel

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Ah yes I remember the Xmen known as dick, he had such a big....personality that sometimes he can be kind of a wanker🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So he's the head of the conspiracy and should be the one charged?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 165 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, suing your customers is a brilliant way to get more people to buy your stuff.

[–] [email protected] 150 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So let me get this straight…

  1. buy a platform
  2. ruin it and push away advertisers
  3. tell them you don’t need them and they should go fuck themselves
  4. sue them for leaving

…?

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

By this next next year... Definitely within the next 1000 months

[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Advertisers have given me no moneys either.

Send cheque plz.

I'd really love to see fElon get what he wants here. One paid ad from all the companies.

"Elon fucks kids"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Can I chip in on this…?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

yeah damnit, I waste my personal time having to watch the damn things. Advertisers should be paying us for the privilege of our attention.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Send cheque plz

I read that in the voice of Mona-Lisa Saperstein from Parks and Rec

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Money pweeez!

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Suing former advertisers may possibly not be the best way to get other advertisers to come to your platform.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man who told advertisers to go fuck themselves sues advertisers for not spending money on his platform.

I'm sure this will be sure to bring in tons of advertising dollars to Der Xitter.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

I ain't no genius, but maybe the advertisers are busy fucking themselves as per Elon's suggestion. 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 month ago

Wow, I didn't think he could top his past idiocy, but this is pretty impressive. "You were unfair to me because I'm a terrible piece of shit and you didn't want the association of your brand and my nazi site so you owe me money!" It's just incredible.

Hat tip, Lonnie. You've outdone yourself again.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Musk is suing under antitrust laws. I’m not sure they work that way. Antitrust laws prevent producers from consolidating and exploiting consumers. However, when it comes to advertising placements, the companies are consumers, not producers, and I don’t think a consumer advocacy group (which the World Federation of Advertisers functions as in this regard) is illegal.

I don’t know, I am not a lawyer, but it seems like Twitter is grasping at straws here.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Let's also note that at any other time, Musk would be railing against antitrust laws.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

The interesting thing is that it means he is desperate enough to try something that makes him look this stupid

Anybody with Elon Musk centric stocks needs to sell them quickly

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

I know right? I mean if they colluded to lower advertising prices through collective agreement that would be something. Especially if they had an internal forcing mechanism to ensure compliance.

But um, they set out voluntary guidelines they suggested everyone follow to protect each member's own best interests, and decided to spend zero dollars to buy nothing, which is a far far cry from trying to spend zero dollars to buy something.

What an ultra-maroon.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mandatory product purchasing. The ultimate capitalist’s wet dream…

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just like vehicle insurance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago

Your honor, I demand they like me. Why doesn't anyone like me...

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you Exhibit A.

That is all, I rest my case. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine the prosecuting attorney in the opening scene of Better Call Saul, coming into the court room with a tape of this in his hand.

Without saying a word, the tv cart is pushed into the court room and he slowly pushed the tape in.

The entire court room stays silent as the video is played, with the lone exception of Musk who is tweeting about how unfair the judge is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Goddamn he looks so punchable

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The duden must have a fetish for doomed lawsuits.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Courtroom BDSM fetish

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

Didn't he sue another company that did tests on the site to see if ads would show up beside hateful content, which showed they would, and that case ended up being dismissed?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

"Why did people stop paying me for services I no longer provide!?"
- Some guy who burnt down his house and then yelled at Air BnB users for cancelling their bookings

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Being a lawyer and working for someone like Musk must be both rewarding and embarrassing at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

rewarding

lucrative, yes... rewarding? maybe not so much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rewarding because you can accurately gauge exactly how much smarter you are than the world's richest man?

Or rewarding because you get to burden the legal system with all those hypotheticals that the one troll in your law classes kept asking and your professors kept claiming "no judge would ever entertain that idea"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Free market gets sued for practising freedom

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

“Free speech absolutionist” my ass

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

His "Free Speech Absolutionism" is just.... Freedom from any consequences for what you say.... Which is also a really stupid thought process..

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Welp, time to set up a lemonade stand and sue everybody who didn’t stop to buy my $5000 cups of watered-down kool-aid.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I didn’t know we could be entitled to advertisement money. Hang on while I sue Unilever for some free money in return for wearing a sandwich board with their logo on it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Something, something, free market something

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

What a pinheaded twit.

[–] solsangraal 4 points 1 month ago

holy shit i honestly don't know whether i hate twatter/muks more or advertisers more--is it possible for them to both lose, please?

load more comments
view more: next ›