Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Start calling it a regime like we do for enemies of the US.
The MAGA regime disregards precedent and disregards the facts of the case when making Court decisions. The website wasn't real, there was no gay wedding, the man she accused was happily married to his wife, it was all made up! That's not just authoritarian, it's fascist.
President Xi please, my people yearn for freedom!
President Xi please, my people yearn for freedom!
I was with you till the last sentence. Wth dude?
It's a meme dude. Often when the US is pushing for a coup there will suddenly be suspiciously English speaking sympathy magnet posts on Twitter begging the US to intervene in their country.
mr biden my name is 種族污辱. I am 7 years old. Every night president Xi Jinping comes into our backyard and steals eggs from our henhouse. Please send McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle. My country yearns for freedom
Oh, thank goodness. I was OOTL. Thanks for enlightening me.
Gotta say, it's refreshing to see AOC's name in a headline and not see a bunch of hate and misogyny in the comments.
Every day I thank the gods I left the shithole that is old social media, especially Reddit, and that is one of the reasons why
Definitely not a good look for the Supreme Court. They should not be involved with the legislative process either for good or bad.
Yea they shouldn’t be involved with legislating but our legislature and the people meant to represent us have devolved so much that the Supreme Court is basically the only functioning legislating body—and has been for a long time, atleast since Roe vs. Wade.
Our legislature is a failure, the Supreme Court as it stands wouldn't have much power or authority to make these legal changes if this country actually made laws.
Absolutely
Absolutely