this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
557 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2675 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former CIA Director Leon Panetta warned that Trump’s return to the White House could embolden Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, giving him a "blank check" in the Middle East and increasing the risk of war with Iran.

Panetta expressed concern that Trump would support Netanyahu's aggressive stance against Iran without restraint, potentially worsening regional instability.

Panetta also predicted Trump might allow Russia to retain parts of Ukraine if he returns to office, though he doubted Trump’s negotiation skills.

He criticized Trump’s approach to foreign policy, suggesting Trump would be inclined to "capitulate" to authoritarian leaders, which may not sit well with some Republicans.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago

"ex official said: this might happen and that might mean" how is this relevant news?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

How would that be different than the current plan under Biden?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What is fucked is that no matter what happens. They will insist that it was all the Democrat's fault and all the fault of communists and socialists. They will be believed both despite the absurdity of it all and because of the absurdity of it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

in reality it was the 20 million voters that abstained from voting this election.

Screenshot_20241108-093218_Firefox

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, because DNC didn't do a spectacularly bad job of fucking up the campaign.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

May the people in this sub who screeched Genocide Joe and threatened Kamala over her continued support for Israel get the policies they voted for.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 hours ago

But at least they got join MAGA to own the libs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I believe Putin's power over Trump will prevent anyone doing anything extreme about Iran. Russia has always had an interest in controlling Iran and certainly would not approve the US taking it out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

I think that Netanyahu has more power than Putin at this point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So the same thing as Biden?

The war with Iran is already on the doorstep of happening under Bidens unconditional aid.

Such a shame Kamala did not get elected. Who also promised unconditional aid and advocated for starting a war with Iran.

Posts like this would have a lot more impact if the Democrats were different.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago

No Kamala would‘ve saved us! /s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

He criticized Trump’s approach to foreign policy, suggesting Trump would be inclined to “capitulate” to authoritarian leaders, which may not sit well with some Republicans.

Don't they even know who they picked to represent them?

[–] [email protected] 61 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (12 children)

Waiiiiit, are you saying that not voting Kamala didn't magically stop the genocide in Gaza?????

That it only accelerates it, like I and other people have been saying for months????

WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING?!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I got banned from a community saying this as calmly as possible XD Idk i feel like theses tankies who were overwhelmingly hostile are either shills or hypocrits who just want to hurt the big bad capitalist, short and long term consequences be damned. (Tankies=/=Leftists just a reminder)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yep, running two pro-genocide candidates did absolutely nothing to stop the genocide.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

That should put paid to the myth that Trump is 'the antidote to all the wars'.

I always thought that the argument 'no wars were started during his presidency' was bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 14 hours ago

crazy to think that trump might do exactly what he said he was going to do. how could we, the voters, have predicted this?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Libs still have zero self-awareness. Promoting genocide for months in the most condescending and futile manner... Then continuing to blame everyone else after they inevitably lose yet again.

Seriously Trump is a garbage person who would be easy to beat with Bernie, Michelle, etc. But the libs gotta impose their terrible politics on everyone. Gotta shove their genocide down our throats.

load more comments
view more: next ›