LifeInMultipleChoice

You sir, are a good person. I will forever be in your gratitude for following up in research. I always try to follow truth within my arguments. You today helped me know I didn't lie. Thank you

Where in Project 2025 do they say that? Because it says to break it up and commercialize it everywhere I have seen. So I am saying why that it bad, not just making up that they said to eliminate it where I haven't seen.

Let's be honest for 1 moment. Is Vance guilty of Treason. After this non-response, Absolutely Yes.

They all have lines against them already, the banks won't do it.. that's why he couldn't get the loans to pay the courts on time. If he had it he would have paid it day 1 and laughed it off to turn it into a power move as if he lost nothing, instead he was humiliated

Agreed, but really if I weren't trying to profit on any of it... I wouldn't touch much of any of it. Let nature do it's work on all of it but the way in/out and living space

Yeah, I was curious so I was looking the other day, median household income I believe came out to 14% of the median house cost in the U.S. (in 2022) in 1975 it was around 28%.

It's why some devices have batteries in opposite directions. All they need is a piece of metal on one end, and a split on the other, and you went from 1.5 volts to 3. (1.5v for AA, AAA, C, D batteries)

Vance would just act like it was a filibuster and rant about nonsense and yell lies for an hour not allowing Tim to be heard, and call it a "power move.". Idiots would think it showed he was strong, while ignoring the craziness of it all.

Debates don't have unlimited time. That would simply allow them to lie every time a person has the last say on a topic. Making the other person have to use their time to speak on the next topic about a previous topics bologna, making minimal time to actually reply and a constant distraction from answering the questions which were hopefully designed to allow voters to better understand the positions of the candidates.

Tally's don't really work well either because lies aren't always black and white. Say for instance someone says x number of people or $x were spent on something or were effected by something. If they say 400,000 but it was really 389,000... You would have to mark that as a lie equivalent to a lie saying John Snow wasn't a character in game of thrones.

Doubt they would eliminate the names, that would hurt the "creditibility" beholden by the names they would want to use for their gain. I think it would go more like Amtrak, or the Prison systems. Destroying the pieces they don't want, and making profits off the parts they can. Slowly pushing their agendas hiding behind the name of something they can use a disguise while most of the country never recognizes it changed. The parts they can't profit off of they would leave as a burden to the people, and the profitable and influencial parts they will strip and grab.

What did they change the onside kick too? It used to be it has to go 10 yards and if they received it it stayed where they landed, and if you failed to make 10 yards it was a penalty and the other tram recieved the ball. Out of bounds kicks start at the 40? If I remember. Haven't watched much this season. I liked the old kickoffs as I didn't think big returns were all that rare, but game changing. That said, I clearly understand why they would want them changed as it is an extremely dangerous situation the players are put in.