It's as easy as declaring coal "clean".
So, no, water won't be cleaner. Especially not with the new fucknut at the EPA.
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
80 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19239 readers
1837 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
No. He will gut the EPA if he doesn't kill it completely. It will be down to individual states to attempt to regulate that stuff, and even then, states already get a ton of their funding from the federal EPA, so they're all fucked when that money dries up.
So no more lead service line replacements. No more PFAS removal, no more water quality standards, no more air quality standards.... How long before the Potomac is on fire again...
Who needs clean drinking water, amirite?
Of course not. There's definitely a correlation of some sort between areas with high lead exposure and Republican voters.
I have a friend who studies PFAs at a well known university in my state. Their department is all starting to talk about how they're expecting people to come into the department and slow down the research as much as possible by whatever means necessary. All because of the Trump presidency.
So the answer is simple. No.
Trump? The guy who gutted the EPA? That guy? OK.
He's going to follow the same plan as he did for COVID. He'll remove all regulations and then attack anyone trying to measure the impact. Might even make it illegal to report on pollution if he can.
Trump lies.
Lolololololololol
Clean just means clear.