this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
318 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19237 readers
2119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Good old "Nothing will fundamentally change" Joe.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Hey now at least he helped start a genocide.

What a legacy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

slavers gonna slave

that is our legacy

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They say Biden, I hear complicit.

It's amazing how a being without a spine sat in the White House chair for four years without falling over.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Crime Bill Biden ran out the clock on purpose. He never had any intention to reschedule cannabis.

NONE.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

The only meaningful change for this would be via legislation, otherwise trump can just as easily undo it the same day.

Edit: looks like the process is much more complicated and actually Biden already started the process at the beginning of this year (April): https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/update-deas-efforts-reschedule-cannabis-what-you-need-know-2024-09-11/ , I don't understand this article

Edit 2: the letter is actually asking him to try to hurry the process up (the article from September that I linked says there supposed to be hearing scheduled this Monday (Dec 2nd)). It is very misleading (as you can see from the comments), because it implies Biden is just ignoring this issue completely.

https://lee.house.gov/imo/media/doc/letter_to_biden_admin_re_marijuana.pdf

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

He actually started the process to review what it was scheduled as to get it changed in 2022. It like everything else surrounding our government takes forever.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-submits-proposed-regulation-reschedule-marijuana

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It like everything else surrounding our government takes forever.

Unless of course it's something he wants to do, like sell weapons for an ongoing genocide. Then all bureaucracy evaporates into nothingness.

His hands are untied when he wants them to be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Look, I get that you’re trying to make a point, but this is like complaining your parents were able to pay the mortgage every week but not buy you a new bike. One is planned, budgeted, agreed upon by all parties. The other is something you want, that takes time and planning which has yet to take place.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Giving away arms to a genocide isn't... budgeted.

What line item(s) can you point to for "Palestinian Genocide Budget"?

There's literally a law on the books that says he MUST stop arms transfers to Israel, since the UN has declared an ongoing genocide.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Everything with government doesn’t have to be slow, but congress wrote this bill so that two successive presidents would have to keep pursuing it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

He was never going to do it and never will.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But then the democrats couldn't dangle it in front of us next election.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We are still working on legalizing abortion with a simple law after 50 years. These things take time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Biden, smiling as he puts on shades and eats ice cream: "No. Peace, I'm out."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, everyone said he was too old to do the job.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Guessing weed business would boom, and government gain a tonne of tax, which Trump would take credit for.

So no. Can't see him doing it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Big tax cash cow here in Canada, that's for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

They're not calling for hi m to legalize it, the letter they wrote is asking him to reschedule it from a schedule 1 drug to a schedule 3 drug. Still can't see him doing it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Isn't it already ruled he has presidential immunity? Why isn't he doing more? I understand he has some time but like... I hope there's at least a "welcome package" for trump. I have no faith in anything anymore

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. All faith in democrats wanting to do the BAREST MINIMUM to make a difference is flat out gone. Both sides apparently want the poor dead or in prison. Republicans are just gonna make it happen faster.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Its only immune if the supreme court deems it an official act. This court will not give him the same leeway as they will Trump.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The time to do that really would have been before the election... He did reschedule it, but that can be undone day one. I honestly think the fascist voters would credit Trump. I've heard them say "already things are getting better" with no hint of irony.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

He did reschedule it

He did not. Cannabis is still Schedule I.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Damn you're right, they did start the process, but the DEA pushed it back to 2025 after originally expecting it this year.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The DEA whose head Biden appointed decided to wait until the next president could block it?

I wonder if Biden ran it by Joe Manchin or the senate parliamentarian first.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I worry that they'll just open a can of worms and fuck up our farm bill access.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Democrats, the reason we lost is that we didn’t singularly campaign to Republicans in Detroit. That is the only deciding vote. 20 Republicans in Detroit. In 2028 it is TANTAMOUNT that we knock on 1 Republican door in Pennsylvania and 15 doors in Detroit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Biden was 6 when Reefer Madness came out. I doubt he understands it in a modern context.

load more comments
view more: next ›