this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
316 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3083 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is such a terrible take... For those that read the article he says that it's fine the way it is because the elite rich pay more money into taxes than the working class... Like no shit thats basic math. We're asking for them to pay an EQUAL share as we do.

If you have a dude who makes $10,000 and is taxed at 1% pays $100 into taxes
And another guy makes $100 but is taxed at 10% and pays $10 into taxes

Is that fair just cause the first dude 'paid more money?? Fuck no it's not.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the problem is that most of us define "rich" by the accumulation of wealth, but for tax purposes it's usually defined as annualized earned income. Many billionaires pull no salary, and manage to defer capital gains so effectively pay very little tax.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They also simply don't pay taxes. Tax cheats cost the US roughly a trillion dollars every year, and almost all of it is attributed to the top 5%. If you're wealthy enough to hide your earnings, you are also wealthy enough to fight the IRS and make it too expensive to recover. It's cheaper to buy politicians who defund the IRS than it is to pay your fair share.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to mention the fact that a lot of rich folks can use tax loopholes to pay even less in taxes then the average person. Which is massively fucked up

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

But I think we focus on the wrong loopholes. The ability to accrue capital gains forever and not pay taxes on it, then die and let your heirs take advantage of a basis step-up is fucked up. Maybe if your net worth exceeds a certain amount then you should have to mark-to-market annually and pay taxes as if you sold and rebought at the market price.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's like saying, "it's fair that I live in a mansion and you live in a tent because I can pay for a mansion."

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah. With great power comes great responsibility.

If you can afford to jet off anywhere, get great healthcare without worry, afford a house that fits more than you need (or have multiple houses) while the rest of your society can’t make ends meet even with 2-3 jobs, well, you aren’t paying enough.

I get you should be able to keep what you earn. We all want that, but some of us hoard so much more than we need and don’t give a shit if others starve.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And let's all remember, the money they "earned" was off the value of workers. It's literally the root of capitalism vs socialism. Many just think socialism is just give people what they need for free. In reality, it's workers essentially owning the company so they get all the value of their work. Investors getting money for basically putting numbers in a different column in a spreadsheet is not them honestly earning their keep. The wealthy exploit labor.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This.

Money and wealth accrued because you own some property that some other people toil in or on is not "earned". It's taken from those who earned it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

i used to love watching "Shark Tank". it's pretty gross.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

"Keep what you earn" is a bullshit concept in the first place. If it was a valid ideology at all, then I should be getting paid 100% of the value that I generate for the company I work for. That's what I earned. But nobody's making that argument because it's plainly farcical. So too is the idea that we should "keep what we earn" when it comes to taxes.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Pence isn't speaking to us. Pence is letting the rich know he isn't coming for them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pence has to be one of the dumbest politicians, barring trump. Everyone HATES him. The right hates him for betraying their Lord. The left/center hates him for being a bigot.

Yet he's deluded enough to run for president again? He's going to get 0.00001% of the primary vote and NOBODY will pick him as their VP.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Should we be surprised that this prosperity gospel cultist said something bootlicking about his wealthier owners?

'Merika, the best politicians you can buy!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't even have to spend that much to get them to vote one way or the other. That is the sad part.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's not the dollars they give, that's just the teaser. It's the board positions, the slush funds, the private parties, the jobs for friends. It's so much deeper than just giving money to a campaign, or even just a suitcase full of money.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That fly is probably throwing up in his hair. Thanks fly!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the app I was testing was only posting the photos and not the links. I've fixed the links.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Perfect thumbnail. I had forgotten about the fly incident. What a moment in political meme history.

load more comments
view more: next ›