this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
672 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19223 readers
3144 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Right when he's completely useless, he pushes for this. Pathetic and disingenuous.

(page 3) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago

You could have pushed for it when there was actually an attempt to make that bill (before Pelosi killed it, she repaid you by pushing you out).

[–] [email protected] 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why wait until the last possible second to go for this? What a complete knob

[–] [email protected] 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Because he doesn't need to work in politics ever again and this is going to be a pretty unpopular policy to lobby for. No one who ever has to whip votes on the Hill would ever put this kind of proposal forward. It was always going to come from a fringe of a caucus or a lame duck President.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn’t check out. He wasn’t going to work in politics ever again 4 years ago.

He’s only doing it now because he knows he has no time to actually ever achieve it and is safe to play for optics without worrying about actually helping people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago

Well, he claimed that his intent was to be a one-term President. Now we see that was a lie.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago

As if congress is going to bring up a bill that would restrict one of the quickest ways to make money for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 21 hours ago

Jesus Christ Joe, are you trying to take food from their children's mouths? How dare you sir, insider trading is the only real perk they get...well Healthcare and insider trading.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 21 hours ago

Destroy Wall Street. Literally remove it brick by brick if you have to. That cancer is killing us all and we're all tied to it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 21 hours ago

im sure congress will get right on the thing that literally makes them all wealthy, and theyve made sure to enshrine as a-ok in their own rules.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago

Well guess who makes laws on stock trading?

🙃

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

Actually, the word is that there is a bipartisan bill moving though Congress to prohibit stock sales. Crazy, right? Anyway, this is just Biden saying he'll sign it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

LET'S GOOOO!!

Ignoring how long it took, big ups joey b

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Take what you can get. Bitching about how you got there isn't helpful.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›