this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
271 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4573 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Glad Biden is doing that. Good move.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just wait until some lemming explains why this is bad for unions and Biden is the devil in Big Oil pockets because he refused to have the whole economy hostage for a conflict. When he still negotiated after the fact and the workers got what they wanted.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What is with all of these articles that look shorter than a Twitter conversation?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Just there to get a click and maybe a couple ads in. Surprisingly standard now when looking for news.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Any longer and it might mention the rail strike.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Biden actually got the rail workers everything they asked for months after the strike ended. I had no idea about this until recently so figured I'd share.

https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Holy fuck, stop repeating this bullshit people. The IBEW voted for the original contract with 1 sick day. They're a small part of the railworkers and weren't one that wanted to strike in the first place. And they absolutely did not get everything they wanted. They wanted 15 days! Congress tried to give them 7! Biden got them 4. Nevermind the non-sick day asks.

Unions deserve the right to accept or reject their own contracts, not wait for a third party to decide what's reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Here's an article where strike leader Tony Cardwell, President of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way of Employee's division, explains that 4 sick days was the lowest offer they were willing to accept. I wish Biden did things differently in general, and they have every right to be unhappy and to push for further change, but Biden did actually work with them to get the minimum they wanted.

The minimum is not exactly worth an endearing compliment, though. But the situation is more complicated than just that Biden fucked over unions.

https://www.npr.org/2022/11/29/1139765222/rail-workers-are-demanding-better-work-conditions-and-a-strike-could-be-imminent

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Biden actually got the rail workers everything they asked for

Everything?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You think 4 sick days a year is "everything they asked for"? Really?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

It's most of what they asked for, actually, which is a sad indictment of the initial state of affairs

They wanted 7.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/employment-conditions/national-employment-standards#nes-entitlements

Welcome to somewhere between Europe and Murica

(TLDR 20 days annual leave, 10 days sick and 10 days emergency domestic violence leave, unpaid community service leave. :( )

load more comments
view more: next ›