this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
75 points (90.3% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3203 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good luck with that.

The civil trial is over, this is just damages. Also, Letitia James should go after Trump for these crimes.

Because it's literally fraud.

This is a desperate attempt to cancel out Baba's incompetence regarding a jury setting damages vs. the judge that Trump has been insulting from day one.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not even that, it's just Elise Stefanik, a completely shameless grifter who cares about nothing but her own aggrandizement, seeing an opportunity to demonstrate fealty to Trump. She sees the end of Mike Johnson's speakership coming around the corner and is already campaigning for the job.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I live near, but not in Elise Stefanik's district. That means I get subjected to her horrible political ads, but can't actually vote against her. (But at least she doesn't represent me in Congress.)

I hope, one day, her district kicks her out so I can stop seeing her ads every few years. Sadly, her district is pretty red so I doubt she'll be kicked to the curb anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Political shills.

If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell

Carl Sandburg

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She is complaining that a billionaire and ex president is being held accountable for crimes he did. And if they can do it to the rich and powerful they could hold any of us to the law.

This women is awful.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's trying to help the defense showing that that the judge is biased. They want to appeal. They know they are going to lose badly, so are tilting at windmills.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Trump already lost the civil case, the judge found him guilty of fraud. Everything in the case now is just about damages and penalties.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Her mother drank when she was pregnant.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Not enough unfortunately...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"If Judge Engoron can railroad a billionaire New York businessman, a former President of the United States, and the leading presidential candidate, just imagine what he could do to all New Yorkers,” Stefanik writes.

"If this can happen to someone who is above the law, imagine what could happen to you regular people."

Literally making her own counter argument in favour of the rule of law.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

This is terrible journalism too. The entire article gives voice to the ravings of a hack while giving no account of a potential explanation, context or opposing view.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

"Dear Supreme Court, it’s only okay when our side takes their opponents to court."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

"Americans are sick and tired of the blatant corruption by radical ~~Leftist~~ Right wing judges...'

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I love how all of these performing trumpanzees ignore all of the evidence of trump committing fraud.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't realize that if there are "no victims" you can get away with anything

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Somebody should tell credit card scammers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


She said the judge has failed to honor Trump’s due process rights, concerns that she said are exacerbated by the former president’s position as the front-runner for the presidential nomination.

Engoron issued a partial gag order on Trump last month after he made disparaging remarks about a law clerk on social media and to reporters.

“If Judge Engoron can railroad a billionaire New York businessman, a former President of the United States, and the leading presidential candidate, just imagine what he could do to all New Yorkers,” Stefanik writes.

“All Americans, including political opponents, must receive due process and equal protection under our U.S. and New York Constitutions,” Stefanik wrote.

“Judge Engoron’s disdain for President Trump and his politics are evident, and the Commission must take corrective action to restore a just process and protect our constitutional rights.

Last month, the American Civil Liberties Union argued that the federal judge presiding over Trump’s criminal case over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election had violated his First Amendment rights when issuing a gag order.


The original article contains 659 words, the summary contains 173 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

She's actually pretty smart. The problem is that she's an opportunity seeker and a grifter. She'll take any position if it advances her political aspirations. If she thought that being a socialist was the key to political power, she'd suddenly be yelling "defund the police," "tax the rich," and be advocating to protect the environment.

Of course, socialism isn't where she sees her political power coming from so she's full blown MAGA - until MAGA falls out of favor and then she'll be 100% on board with the next big thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

She said the judge has failed to honor Trump’s due process rights, concerns that she said are exacerbated by the former president’s position as the front-runner for the presidential nomination.