The recent almost shutdown kind of made it hard to give it more money to Ukraine if they wanted things to keep running.
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
World News
2290 readers
163 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
The whole government shutdown was never going to happen. However, what they were trying to do was to approve money for Ukraine without a vote. While the vote will almost certainly pass in the end, it does open debate on the issue and that's what I think they were trying to avoid here.
I'm not sure why though, honestly, wouldn't a vote pass overwhelmingly? The faction of the GOP that would actually vote against funding more aid to Ukraine is too small to stop the rest of the GOP and basically every Democrat.
It's going to pass, but this puts a spotlight on the spending and I'm pretty sure GOP will campaign on this as the election season ramps up. I expect in the next few months we'll see more and more republicans start to question proxy war spending and that's going to put increasing pressure on the dems.
So are they sending ATACMS or not?
So I'm guessing war with China just got promoted up the priorities list. Yay.
Lindsey Graham did just say recently that the whole point of the war in Ukraine is to send a message to China.
It probably didn't send the message he was thinking of
Seems like the key message is that if you're gonna start shit then don't fuck around at the start trying to negotiate with the west.