this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
73 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4954 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama said Tuesday he is releasing the bulk of his holds for Senate votes to confirm military promotions.

Tuberville told his colleagues in a closed-door meeting on Capitol Hill that he will release the promotions for three-star nominees and below, the vast majority of the nominees.

The move comes after he faced bipartisan pressure to cease his blanket hold on military promotions over a Defense Department reproductive rights policy. Tuberville’s hold started in March and delayed the confirmations of more than 450 top military nominees.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Time to call the vote on the remaining 10. Make the Senate stay through the night for each one. If Tubs won't do his job, make them all suffer for it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Yuuuup. We probably couldn't do every nomination that way, but we can definitely do a dozen. WillyWonkaYouLose.gif

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago

Tuberville said he has no regrets after he released hundreds of holds without getting anything in return.

“We saw some success. We didn’t get as much out of it as we wanted,” Tuberville said.

I love this.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Keep going, Tommy. Dig that hole. I'm sure holding up military promotions is very endearing to your base.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They don't give a fuck. The right only 'supports our troops' on bumper stickers. When it comes to actual policy, the military is just another out-group to fuck over.

The wild part is how many troops/vets refuse to see that and vote against their own interests.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

The right literally stand for nothing. They're a party of grifters who change their positions when it suits their greed best. The accusation of being a hypocrite doesn't even phase them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

It's not that wild, is there anything more republican than voting against your own best interests?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Don't worry, they'll go ask people at Walmart what they think.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can someone explain to me why one person can deadlock the process so badly?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama said Tuesday he is releasing the bulk of his holds for Senate votes to confirm military promotions.

The move comes after he faced bipartisan pressure to cease his blanket hold on military promotions over a Defense Department reproductive rights policy.

Tuberville’s hold started in March and delayed the confirmations of more than 450 top military nominees.

Tuberville made the announcement that he was backing off the military holds with the exception of fewer than a dozen four star promotions during Senate lunch.

He said it was important that Republicans be united and not vote for a rules changes that would have allowed Schumer to bring up nominees en bloc.

Asked what his message was to military families who have been affected by his holds, Tuberville responded, “Thank you for your service.”


The original article contains 286 words, the summary contains 137 words. Saved 52%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!