"non-human" is not the same as "non-terrestrial". We've shot a lot of non-human "biological material" into space.
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
18 points (76.5% liked)
World News
38262 readers
1972 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Or leather seats, random bacteria that hitched a ride, etc. Hell, plastics are derived from biological material and could qualify if you really stretch your definition. It's a nothing statement.
like Jeff Bezos for instance
BAZINGA!
Unless the non-human material was associated with the discovery of a UFO then there's no reason to think it's not just animal matter.
I believe UFOs have been seen, but that shit is just experimental aircraft kept secret either by government projects or private research organizations.
I remember there was a big wave of UFO sightings in the 90s, people talking about aircraft moving in super nimble ways that aircraft shouldn't be able to move and that sort of thing, and then 20 years later we had drones.
I definitely wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these sightings were early attempts at drones long before we knew about them, they're smaller than aircraft of course but people might not have understood how far away they were, especially at night.
I remember when I was younger RC plane and helicopter community was all about doing night flights with lots of lights and other things on their vehicles. I remember seeing tricking stuff on the fronts of RC hobby magazines with guides on how to do it.
Experiments aircraft that can accelerate and change directions at Mach 2 ?
Am I crazy here? Did the whole world not see the gimbal and tic tic videos.
Yes I have seen them. Even if these aircraft are real, I suspect the capabilities have been exaggerated. The footage is grainy as hell and could be some sort of illusion.
They totally could be real. But either way, I don't see any reason why humans couldn't create such technology. And if they did I'm sure they would be inclined to keep it secret.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs - Gimbal is people not understanding how gimbal cameras work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cThB1zfynHQ - Tic Tac is people not understanding how planes work with low res digital zoom.
The Tic tac was seen, with their eyes, by four different military pilots. It was also captured in multiple different sensor arrays, data that has been classified. The video is the only thing available because it was leaked, but there is other sensor data that corroborates both the video and the pilot's testimony. We don't have access to that data only because the military doesn't want us to.
It's almost as if it's a cultural phenomenon. And the map reflects population density of english speakers. https://xkcd.com/1138/
This doesn't prove anything other than susceptible people are relatively evenly distributed.
Or maybe that the aliens speak english ;)
That comic is not applicable. You don't have to speak english to report or see a UFO. That doesn't make any sense. What it does tell us (to follow the language thread) is english-speakers seem more susceptible to believing they saw it. It's a cultural issue is the implication.
This doesn’t prove anything other than susceptible people are relatively evenly distributed.
The point is the susceptible people are heavily concentrated in the US and the UK. Arguably Australia/NZ. How on earth is this map evenly distributed to you?
Think about what language the UFO pop culture is produced in. It's not that english speakers are more susceptible due to the language itself, but rather, they've been consuming media about UFOs in english. Thus the map is effectively a heat map showing the population of english speakers.
Or do UFOs not cross the Rio Grande? ;)
So I think you're missing the point because I agree. The implication is all of these sightings are nonsense/not real, the public is just really susceptible in these areas for the exact reasons you and I are talking about.
Notice the comment I was initially responding to. It's the kind of video that would make an english speaker's imagination run wild
Oh, hi new friend :)
Ha all good. Also sorry "you're missing the point" is a little more abrasive phrasing than I initially intended.
Like plant or animal material?
Sentient plant material. Like a Venus flytrap only with more of an attitude
Venusian Guy Trap
I saw that documentary!
There was a lot more singing than I expected.
Which movie was that?
David Grush says it was "Dead pilots"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims
David Grusch also says the Pope helped smuggle a UFO out of Mussolini's Italy to the U.S. and I have no idea why anyone gives someone who says something that nutty any credibility.
Literally all of the evidence I have been able to find backing his claims is him saying "just trust me this definitely happened." He hasn't shown any documents. He claims to have them, and that he'll give them to congress, but has not publicly released them.
It's your standard conspiracy grift- make up something that's plausible for you specifically to know, back it up with nothing because there's nothing to back it up with, do the media circuit spreading your bullshit, sell a bunch of books, retire.
His entire argument to congress is basically "the military isn't telling you about everything they do, and I say they have alien bodies and spacecraft" which... yeah, I 100% believe that the military doesn't tell everything they do to congress because congress is full of people who would openly release classified materials to the public just to do it. It makes logical sense for the military not to tell them all of the programs they have going at any given time, even if I think that isn't constitutional and shouldn't actually be allowed. That doesn't prove anything though.
He's trying to use the military hiding information from congress to back up his claim that they have an alien bodies program and it just doesn't work. But stupid people will happily eat it up though!
Unless the military actually releases info that corroborates what he is saying I'm not going to believe a word of it.
Except that he has delivered classified documents and evidence to authorities with the right clearances? Of course he can't just publish classified documents, unless he wants to end up like Snowden. He is following the correct procedures for whistleblowers, and that's why you get to see nothing but people with the right clearences do. Multiple congressmen have had classified briefings on the subject and they don't think Grusch is lying.
Sorry for the long text, TL;DR at the end.
Maybe I'm wrong or saw it incorrectly, but the feeling I got about that hearing was that there were many people with different ideas on what the topic was about and nothing was actually answered.
Some reps were asking about extraterrestrial lifeforms and spaceships, some others about UAPs made by enemy countries that could potentially pose a threat to the US national security, some others talked about the Chinese ballon and the incompetence of the government when dealing with those events (which kinda falls into the previous point, but it was more of critique to the government rather than a question IMO)
Then the "whistleblower" (the one that talked a lot and said nothing) was just focusing in wanting some kind of place/means/way to report those kinds of incidents with UAPs/UFOs anonymously because they faced what he called "administrative terrorism", and the other two seemed to literally just want to talk about UFOs and spaceships.
The "whistleblower" didn't really say anything outside of "I can't confirm nor deny that in an open setting, I'll gladly give you the information in a closed one", there was nothing substantial about that hearing IMO.
Non-human biological material =/= extraterrestrial material, and in one of the questions, which was something along the lines of "where did you get that info?" He basically replied with a "just trust me bro, I've talked to some people".
DISCLAIMERS: I stopped listening to it after about 4 hours and a half, so I don't know if he said anything substantial after that. Also, English is not my first language so if I made any mistakes or am talking out of my ass, do call me out on it.
TL;DR: IMO that hearing was just a waste of time and nothing of importance was said.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/XO8Dlw_nUto
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Good bot
When is someone gonna at least provide a photo or video or other proof of this shit they keep saying exists?
Dudes who have hacked into the DOD or other systems and claimed to have found documents of this kinda stuff never actually showed those documents to anyone. What was the point of breaking in and taking it then?!
They're just people looking for attention.
Ask yourself - why did everyone got to see photos of the Chinese spy balloon, but nothing of the other 3 objects that were subsequently shot down by F22's? The military most surely has photos of those objects also, why haven't they showed them?
What the whistleblowers have been saying is that the government has indisputable evidence in the form of photos, videos, sattelite images, radar tracks, and even recovered crafts and bodies. If you haven't seen any of that evidence, it's because they don't want you to see it. Multiple congressmen have seen it in classified briefings, the evidence yoy want does exist.
I want to believe aliens created a space ship beyond our comprehension and then got to earth and immediately crashed into a tree. I want to believe in intergalactic slapstick comedy.
If they determine it's just random animals, the conspiracy nutters will claim it's the cows that the UFOs beamed up .
view more: next ›