AeroLemming

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

All I'm trying to say is that they're not necessarily doing the same thing now that they were back then. They'd have a strong motivator to be better than google nowadays instead of just copying their results because google's results suck now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is funny, but it was also 13 years ago. A lot can change in that time. I don't personally use Bing though, so I don't have firsthand experience either way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I see, interesting. Do you know if there's a way to completely prohibit an app from running in the background other than just using the "restricted" battery mode for it, which doesn't stop it completely?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I only have 1 app active in the background and it's a custom DNS. I'm very good about keeping all my apps closed when I'm not using them and notifications are disabled for most apps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Phone batteries still do that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I can see why you'd prefer braces in that case. I actually personally prefer {} over indentation as a matter of opinion, I just see them both as working fine 99% of the time. I'd also definitely take indentation over some shenanigans like start/end to define scopes.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (17 children)

I don't understand why people complain about their Python code breaking because it relies on indentation instead of explicit {} syntax. I've never had an issue with it and it's not just because I'm used to it because Python is the only language I use that relies on whitespace like that. I think the complainers just don't know how to indent properly, which makes me really glad they're writing in a language that forces them to instead of pushing unreadable garbage in other languages.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So it's sort of like Minecraft structured like Roblox? (Minus the corporate greed)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sounds too completely absurd to be real, which is why I believe it. Yikes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think you're giving humans too much credit. If our future ends up going down that path, the people raking in profits will never give up their power and the government won't force them. Mass surveillance will make any resistance effort futile.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

We need to make it illegal to charge different people different amounts of money for the same service based on any criteria other than a poverty discount and a senior discount.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

They're both pushing for it. It was probably the idea of someone with more influence than either of them.

 

I daily drive Firefox, but more and more websites are starting to break without Chromium, so I still have to occasionally switch to get something working. I was using Ungoogled Chromium until I realized that there was no easy way to update it when that pixel-stealing exploit came out a while back.

To be clear, I'm not talking about stock "no settings changed" Vivaldi. With that requirement, even Firefox could be called invasive! What I want to know is if Vivaldi is relatively safe to use with all the telemetry and stuff disabled in the settings and using any necessary extensions.

Thanks!

 

For the past couple of days, I've been getting timed out or needing to wait a very long time for things to load. Did we get another influx of users from Reddit? I haven't seen any announcements. I love this instance and its federation policy because I can just filter out specific instances myself on Boost, so I'll only switch if I really need to.

Just tried to post this and got a time out error. (3x)

Now 400 rate limit.

 

I normally use the Aurora frontend, but I used Google's app to check something. I couldn't help but notice that when I swiped and then let go, the page would barely move past the point I had let go. It had no momentum whatsoever. As soon as I got past the ads, scrolling was back to normal and the exact same flinging motion would send me down by at least a screen's worth.

Has anyone else noticed this?

 
 

It's very nice to see that X people liked a post/comment and Y people disliked it instead of just having a singular "goodness/badness" rating. It (literally, in a mathematical sense) adds a whole new dimension to post ratings and gives us a more nuanced understanding of people's opinions. Plus, it feels a lot better to see that 5 people agreed with you and 7 disagreed when you made a controversial statement instead of just seeing a score of -1 telling you how bad you are.

view more: next ›