MagicShel

joined 1 month ago
[–] MagicShel 3 points 6 days ago

We've had our democratic say. Anything further response from the people will not be democracy. It'll be the same thing the French people said to their aristocracy. The same thing the Russians said to the Tzars.

[–] MagicShel 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It has been made clear that any attempt to tailor a law so that it would predominantly affect a specific person or specific group, as it would in this case because even if it applies to all trans-folk, it would specifically primarily impact this one individual and has been said to be for that purpose (particularly damning).

Not that precedent means anything, so any attempt to litigate that winds up in front of the Supreme Court could go either way. I would hope that even they would see the pettiness here and follow precedent.

I'm not sure of the specifics of the Florida/Disney cases. I do know that it probably could've at least been argued that the law was too narrowly tailored, but I'm not a lawyer or a multi-billion dollar company and maybe there are reasons.

[–] MagicShel 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think this is probably a really good point. I have no issue with AI generated images, although obviously if they are used to do an illegal thing such has harassment or defamation, those things are still illegal.

I'm of two minds when it comes to AI nudes of minors. The first is that if someone wants that and no actual person is harmed, I really don't care. Let me caveat that here: I suspect there are people out there who, if inundated with fake CP, will then be driven to ideation about actual child abuse. And I think there is real harm done to that person and potentially the children if they go on to enact those fantasies. However I think it needs more data before I am willing to draw a firm conclusion.

But the second is that a proliferation of AI CP means it will be very difficult to tell fakes from actual child abuse. And for that reason alone, I think it's important that any distribution of CP, whether real or just realistic, must be illegal. Because at a minimum it wastes resources that could be used to assist actual children and find their abusers.

So, absent further information, I think whatever a person whats to generate for themselves in private is just fine, but as soon as it starts to be distributed, I think that it must be illegal.

[–] MagicShel 68 points 6 days ago (7 children)

That makes it illegal, right? You can't pass a law specifically designed to target individuals.

[–] MagicShel 125 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Todd warns that perceived overreach, like aggressive culture war policies or erratic mass deportation plans, could lead to public backlash and erode Trump’s support.

Why would Trump care? He is transactional, and the people who voted for him can't give him anything more. They are 100% irrelevant to him.

So why would he give a single fuck about alienating them?

[–] MagicShel 6 points 6 days ago

I'm my observation, as a nearly-30-year-vet in the field, it's due to the same factors as always. The technology doesn't enforce the standard. So people do any fucking thing they want because they honestly don't know any better.

I'm working on an app right now. On one of the controllers there is a single endpoint, out of about 30 (which should fucking tell you something right there) that conforms to restful standards. Every single other one of them is wrong. Because folks didn't know better and leaders didn't lead/teach/know any better themselves.

[–] MagicShel 8 points 1 week ago

Shit, I'm angry I wasn't chosen for Hogwarts or the Jedi Academy. That doesn't make any of this bullshit real.

[–] MagicShel 15 points 1 week ago

Oh no! Those dratted hackers!

[–] MagicShel 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That sort of locks in the big players, though, right? If you aren't making Facebook money, how are you going to afford the liability? What happens to a Lemmy or Mastodon instance with a budget of $2500/yr if the operators suddenly become legally liable for what people say on them? What if they are legally liable for what someone in another instance says which then gets federated?

[–] MagicShel 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There was a time when I'd agree with you. But right now I don't see any difference between pissing away 10% of your money on "inefficiency" and giving it to a capitalist and labeling it profit, instead.

[–] MagicShel 31 points 1 week ago

The problem isn't that readers are unable to tell the post is ridiculous. The problem is all the morons who legitimately believe ridiculous things.

[–] MagicShel 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey, I love my state. You can't just leave it to the whims of these schizophrenic fuck-knuckles.

view more: ‹ prev next ›