this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
165 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Chuck Todd argues that Donald Trump is rapidly spending his political capital by prioritizing revenge and culture wars over governance.

His controversial cabinet picks, like Matt Gaetz and Pete Hegseth, signal instability and risk alienating voters who supported him as a rejection of Biden, not an endorsement of Trumpism.

Todd warns that perceived overreach, like aggressive culture war policies or erratic mass deportation plans, could lead to public backlash and erode Trump’s support.

Without delivering stability and results, his presidency could quickly face the same challenges as Biden’s.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagicShel 125 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Todd warns that perceived overreach, like aggressive culture war policies or erratic mass deportation plans, could lead to public backlash and erode Trump’s support.

Why would Trump care? He is transactional, and the people who voted for him can't give him anything more. They are 100% irrelevant to him.

So why would he give a single fuck about alienating them?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Exactly.

What the fuck are the people going to do? Protest? He's already discussed deploying the military/national guard/police/whatever to use lethal force against protestors/demonstrators, either jailing or executing ones not shot.

It would take a total and complete revolt for trump to face any consequences for what he's going to do, or has already done.

And that's not something I think Americans are willing to do until it's much too late.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

You'd need 2/3 of the Senate to vote to get rid of him after years of party purification - the reasonable people are all gone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Chuckles Todd is such a moron. How does someone so vapid and clueless get such position as he has?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Trump's power is not derived from a piece of paper. That was the Democrats mistake.

Trump's power comes directly from the people. In a democracy, ultimately the people get the last say.

The transactions are far from over. There are many more transactions to come. From as little as continuing to support Trump-freindly representatives, all the way up to not actively rebelling against his administration.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Trump's power comes directly from the people. In a democracy, ultimately the people get the last say.

Well it's a representative democracy, a republic. Americans had their say two weeks ago and decided the GOP deserved the Presidency, the Senate, and the House. When combined with conservative majority on the Supreme Court, they can literally run the table for at least the next two years, regardless of any buyer's remorse some American's may have. Buckle up for 4 more years of outrage bait headlines and toothless responses from Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

His voters think his policies were good for the economy and that his anti-VAX policies were good for health.

His people will never know what’s going on.

[–] MagicShel 3 points 6 days ago

We've had our democratic say. Anything further response from the people will not be democracy. It'll be the same thing the French people said to their aristocracy. The same thing the Russians said to the Tzars.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Or... destabilizing things is the point. Hitler rose to power during the great depression. Economic turmoil is an in for authoritarianism, and Trump understands this apparently much better than Chuck Todd.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Trump doesn't understand anything. He's just a puppet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Trump understands that he can do whatever he wants and things will go his way in the end. That's been his whole life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Does it work if the authoritarian provably CAUSES the economic turmoil?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Unfortunately yes, because they scapegoat and use mass propaganda. And frustrated people don't often see things clearly.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No. Trump will not face the same challenges as Biden, and his loss of support doesn’t matter one bit.

Neither the Republican controlled Congress nor the conservative SCOTUS will impeach Trump for overreaching or infringing on the Constitution.

Even if we were still able to protest, it wouldn’t change the lack of accountability Trump will see this term.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Neither the Republican controlled Congress nor the conservative SCOTUS will impeach Trump for overreaching or infringing on the Constitution

Counter point: they will remove him just after the two year mark once his usefulness-conflagration ratio has burned out and install president vance ... for an entire fucking decade

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why would he give two shits about political capital when his fucking shit supreme court started that he can do any illegal shit he wants as long as he's president? He has all the political capital in the world when he's been given dictatorial power that Biden didn't take advantage of.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I'm trying to imagine how the collapse of Rome would have gone if Caesar had been so limp dicked and useless.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Trump is an actual terrorist. He tried to murder congress members. His support with voters will tank over the next 4 years and then people will forget most of it.

His legacy will depend on how well his fans gaslight and how well Biden's recovery holds, just like last time with Obama's recovery.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Which is why it’s a big ol’ four year hourglass for Republicans to make elections irrelevant. That is 100% their plan because while Trump is a verifiable moron, the scum attached to him aren’t stupid.

If you get evil, you hope for stupid evil. That was Trump term 1. This time there’s a LOT of smart evil along for the ride.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Only 2 years if midterms happen. Historically party in control does worse in those but we'll see. Also more nazi seats are up with 20 nazi seats and 13 dem seats up for election in 2026. House is up for reelection as well.

Compared with 2024 which had 18 Dem seats, 11 nazi seats and 4 independents (including sinema and Manchin). Nazis converted 4, Dems got 1 (Sinema).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Dems got 1 (Sinema)

Eww, throw this one back. It's all icky.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Sinemas old seat I should say. Idk the new person.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Didn't this all happen last time we elected him too, and then his cabinet was total chaos for four years? I feel like this is all kinda familiar.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yup.

One headline after another about how much trouble Trump was getting himself into by pulling stunts like this, and little to no consequences for it.

I got a sneaky suspicion that the "Liberal Media" actually loves him. They can make millions on low effort rage bait headlines for the next four years.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 days ago

Political capital is not relevant in a fascist autocracy. He will do what he wants.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The man only knows so to burn through capital. See any of his businesses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

He's still got enough capital to have millions of people voting for him, I guess he keeps finding new bits to burn

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm upset at how right you are. Like wtf?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Me too, bro

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump is a lame duck president on day one. You can interpret this one of two ways: he has no political capital and will be running on authoritarian fumes for his whole term, or his political capital is limitless because he can’t run again and has unshakable blind loyalty from nearly half the country. Since it’s Trump, the worst option is almost certainly correct. Trump will never run out of political capital.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

It is interesting how people think he has "political" capital, or morals at all ... he was carried in 2016, and is carried now, by a solid forceful group behind him who have the money to use him for their own goals. (Think about it: Trump was one guy, totally outside of the political system, and by himself alone made it to president and destroyed the GOP and the justice system)

He can't run out of political steam now, no matter what he does, and it is naive to think he will be thwarted by democratic systems.

The USA will be torn down and remade into what a very small group of people want it to be, not what it needs to be, nor what the world needs it to be, so kiss that influence goodbye.

Untill they are done with Trump, he will be king and elections will be either "postponed" or clearly fraudulous.

Sidenote: No one took him serious when he laid out his project 2025 plans without calling it that, but it's clearly going that way ... and no one took him serious when he proclaimed "you don't need to vote, we have all the votes, have all votes we need" months before the election... Look and behold: just about the whole country miraculously turned red in the elections ..... And everyone is afraid to properly investigate it.

If he dies during his reign, he'll get to appoint either one of his children or has Vance take over, how useful either will be to the shadow government remains to be seen.

Perhaps it is a despot's lesson the USA needs to learn, and after 10+ years, when the current children turn 18 to 20, they might realize a correction is needed and manage to get rid of the Trump hegemony.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

I am thinking that is the plan, use trump then they push him out for being unfit and too extreme after he sets the groundwork, then the heritage foundation takes turns using the JDVance sock puppet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

Chuck didn't get the memo

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

Fascism is like fire. It can spread, but ultimately it destroys the things it needs to keep going. Trump will try and use minorities and Democratic leaders as kindling to keep it going as long as possible. A saving grace for the US is that fascists never voluntarily give up power and so Trump's death will likely result in some reconciliation of how we would like the constitution to actually function. Will there be enough political will to change that? Probably not.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

like aggressive culture war policies or erratic mass deportation plans

That was Trump's campaign, no? It's a bit late for voters to wake up to it or pundits to be bringing up what Harris has tried REALLY hard to get people to notice in the few months leading up to today.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Relentless attack against norms and institutions eventually causes fatigue. I know people who were politically engaged during the Bush and Obama years, but now just don’t want to hear about politics anymore. People are tuning out. What sucks is that they are not properly attributing blame where it is due, and not voting to punish those causing the democratic decay.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Prioritizing over governance? Fully half of his campaign, at least, was promising revenge, and most of the rest was culture wars. Governance has never been his priority, nor that of the dupes who voted for him. He could come out and say he's leaving the actual busy work of running the country to Vance just so he can devote his full attention to hurting the people he wants to hurt, and the Cult would praise it as brilliant delegation and wish him happy hunting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

When you can accuse a guy's dad of being a serial killer and they still kiss up to you, there is no such thing as political capital

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I've said it before, the man steals political capital. When you can lie like he does, you don't need a tit for tat, or even approval from the masses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I see Chuckie is still huffing his own farts. Gotta hand it to him, he's committed.