So there has to be a new department - headed by TWO different people that's going to be dealing with efficiency in the government?
This has to be the dumbest timeline
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
So there has to be a new department - headed by TWO different people that's going to be dealing with efficiency in the government?
This has to be the dumbest timeline
Why does the media just gobble this up? It takes an act of Congress to make a new department. DOGE is bullshit.
"Government Efficiency" is a two-word joke.
There was a time when I'd agree with you. But right now I don't see any difference between pissing away 10% of your money on "inefficiency" and giving it to a capitalist and labeling it profit, instead.
The main difference is that you have a small say in the "inefficiency", whereas the capitalist acts without you having any say.
an oxymoron.
basically what happens when you let two morons suck out all the oxygen.