If it will go in someone's body, it should be completely opensource, from hardware to software.
arthur
Assuming your honesty and good faith on asking this question, the real treasure on our gene pool is it's diversity. Eugenics would, by definition, reduce it. You could assume that it's a low price to pay for health, longevity, strength, intelligence, beauty and so on, but it's not that simple. Even some diseases (~~out~~ or the possibility to develop it) can be beneficial under the right circonstances, e.g. sickle cell anemia can improve resistance to malaria.
It would be great to be able to prevent most diseases before it happens and treat it if it happens (for free, in a universal health care system), but eliminate the genes would be a very bad idea, a healthy specie needs it's diversity to avoid extinction, and we sometimes feel like we are above that risk, but we are not that special.
Much more secure 👍🏾
Zen Browser since last week. Is a Firefox fork.
Technically true
Yeah, but some damage is already done, some contracts with public entities like the military and schools in amazon are now under investigation and may be cancelled.
I think you can block entire instances as a user. But, if not, you can create your own instance and federate with only the instances that you like. Far more work though.
Here: using Thunder.
Your concerns are all valid, but about 1 and 3 there are possible solutions. I'm using Rust+Tonic to build an API and that's eliminate the necessity of proxies and it's very simple to use.
I know that it don't solve all problems, but IMHO is a question of adoption. Easier ~~told~~ tools will be develop for it.
And also, the Dekatrian calendar
Where we would have a less broken, more regular, year calendar that is almost align with the moon cycle.
Is not about how much we have available, is about how much they think they can squeeze us.
True, I had another comment on mind when I wrote it. Someone talking about brain implants. But that's also valid in this case.