czech

joined 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

The meme is split into quadrants and the Clinton's would be in spot number six.

I've got you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

They got a tax credit... do they pay taxes?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Usenet? Most new media can be found there. The most copyright-contentious files are not on there for long so most folks use automated downloaders.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago

We've already solved this issue without biometrics. The manufacturers just cheaped out on actually implementing it in the affected models.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Look for the guy with a burnt cock.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

What do you mean? I never really see much about RFKjr but I don't have him tagged as a topic of interest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure because I live in the US but the feed is based on "tags" you select. It seems like they process stories from around the world but I don't have a grasp on how comprehensive they are, internationally.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not familiar with MBFC. It may be similar but I don't mind throwing some $$ at any project making these efforts. What I like about Ground News is that all the sources for a given story are aggregated to one page, sorted based on political bias, and rated on accuracy. That information combined with the "Blindspot" feature (which highlights when a story is disproportionately covered more by one side) is very powerful IMO. It looks like the blindspot feed it's available to non-subscribers but doesn't include the political bias of the source: https://ground.news/blindspot

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Ground News. The blind spot feature gives me great insight to where my "out of touch" family is coming from with their political narratives.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Economists at Harvard studied a four year period and concluded the IRS gains $4.25 for every $1 spent on auditing wealthiest tax payers.

I wonder if the IRS can immediately recover funds with a magic wand or if it's a protracted, investigative process.

https://www.businessinsider.com/irs-tax-audits-recover-12-dollars-for-every-dollar-spent-2023-6

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Your quote states they get $80b over ten years. How many years has it been? You got this!

view more: next ›