[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I know right. The logic seems to be "well he didn't get charged for it so I shouldn't be either". Yeah, but keeping weapons safe was your job, not his.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

A null vote here is a option. Colloquially called a Donkey Vote, or statistically reported as an Informal Vote, you can write nothing on your voting slip and put it straight in the box. Also since voting is compulsory it is held on a Saturday, there are usually sausage sizzles, there must be enough polling places open so you're not in line for more than 30 minutes, and early voting is a viable option.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Never heard of them, until he's elected. THEN they'll all be best friends.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

"Official Act" violence. Can't wait.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

But hopefully he'll be caught dead in one.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

First off, we'll done for spelling that correctly. Also, there's a name I was glad I'd forgotten.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago

The way Gmail orders conversations/email chains makes it SO hard to figure who's reply to what and what the latest email is. Each email in the chain contains the entire chain before it and you end up reading everything twice just to work out what the hell is going on.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well at least 2016 got us "Pokemon Go.. to the polls!" Eeesh

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

You know how you have to prepare your house when someone is bringing their kids over (especially if you don't have kids of your own) ? That what this is. Things have got so bad that they have to bring in a bunch of new rules just so one adult can finish speaking without a other "adult" talking over them the whole time. Holy shit, this is what it has come to.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Not to mention Ace Ventura's too-long scene of showering, burning his clothes, using a plunger to make himself throw up etc. So you kissed someone you didn't know was trans, grow up.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

That's Doctor to you.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

Aaaaand now we're back at the piece of shit acting like a piece of shit.

7
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I am absolutely sick of Windoze and I'm trying out Linux Mint for my work computer. This has been a bit of a learning curve but I have almost everything working the way I want... but the sticking point is my company uses Dropbox for all file sharing and repository.

I first naively installed Dropbox from the Software Installer but that tried to sync the entire company (many TBs) to my computer. It seems there is no Smart Sync option.

Next I installed Rclone and logged in using that, but it seems to be completely command line based which is absolutely useless. There is no way I'm going to sit here typing out full directory paths and file names every time I need to access something (which is always). I then installed RcloneBrowser, and later the Rclone web GUI, however they BOTH skip the parent folder and put me directly one level down, which is also useless.

Ok I know what you're thinking. I need to create an alias, right? So I did, and my config file now has the lines

[DB]

type = alias

remote = Dropbox:/

but this makes no difference in the web GUI or RcloneBrowser! The frustrating thing is if I use the command line the results I get are:

rclone lsd Dropbox:/ parent directory. Good so far...

rclone lsd DB: parent directory! Yay! So why doesn't this work on either GUI???

If I can't get this to work then I will have to get rid of Linux unfortunately. I can see in many forums I am not the first to have massive issues with Dropbox, but it seems the alias approach works for everyone else. What am I doing wrong?

1
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Apart from Australia getting completely ripped off, I am wondering if anyone had any insight into why they're paying almost $500 million for an aircraft that is worth about a fifth of that amount. This has got to be a continuation of the hilarious AUKUS joke that's been played on them, correct?

view more: next ›

dellish

joined 1 year ago