[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

The problem with making carbon into butter is it will just be released once someone eats it and burns off the calories. BUT, I think you can make soap from just about any oil. So you could turn carbon from the air into fake butter, turn that fake butter into soap, and then store the soap in caves, solving any potential soap shortages for the next several millennia while also solving the climate crisis.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

I feel like both parties are trying as hard as they can to lose this election.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

We can say the media is being unfair to Biden, and it probably is. But it doesn't matter. Biden is clearly terrible at getting positive coverage - whether that's his fault or the media's (and I think we can all recognize it's at least partly his fault). If the goal is to stop Trump, we need someone who can get better coverage.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Just recognize reality. Trump has spent his life in media. He's skilled at crafting a narrative that appeals to the dumbest 51%. His wide variety of horrible characteristics works against that, but you need a candidate who can take advantage of those horrible characteristics. Rather than doing that, Biden has played into Trump's narratives, despite tons of time to prepare. If we would let ourselves see it, we'd recognize it's a binary choice. Go with Biden and make Trump president, or go with anyone else and stop him.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

And promoting disinfo. The blue checkmarks are basically just a way to pay for prioritized disinformation-spreading.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago

Which is exactly why it's really important to have an opponent to Trump who doesn't say dumb things.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Look into switching jobs. Unemployment is on the low end. People who switch jobs tend to make more money, and it's easier to get a high-paying job when you have a job already because employers can't help but think more highly of you if someone else is wiling to employ you.

Depending on what you do a recruiter or staffing agency may help. What's worked best for me is posting an updated linkedin profile with keywords that recuriters will look for that relate to buzzwords for your job. Remember recruiters are typically trained as salespeople and may not know much about your actual job, they just look for words. Put in that you're looking for work (but only show it to recruiters) and see if anyone bites.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago

Are we pretending impeachment does something useful again?

[-] [email protected] 42 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

“We will take over the horribly run capital of our nation in Washington, D.C."

Can't disenfranchise us, we're already disenfranchised. Give us 2 senators and a representative, then you'll have something to take away.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I mean the gift part of it is ridiculous and all, but Putin's hometown is St. Petersburg. A trip to St. Petersburg in 2003 is probably tourism, more a sign of being on Harlan Crow's payroll than Putin's.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago

No, that's a system without rights. A democracy can have rights. In fact, it's hard to have rights without a democracy, because when power isn't shared equally, those with power tend to remove rights from those without or fail to enforce them.

88
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This seems insane to me. I live in a city where maybe 50-60% of people have cars, and most don't drive them that much. Yet every grocery store I'm aware of with the sole exception of the expensive Whole Foods has a fuel rewards points program. Reasons this should be controversial enough to enable a low-cost alternative:

  1. Many people don't drive and therefore pay a little more for groceries because it includes a perk they don't use
  2. It seems like a very ardent pro-fossil fuel move that you'd think would cause some sort of negative attention from environment activists.
  3. The subsidy typically applies as an amount off per gallon, so you end up really subsidizing big vehicles with big gas tanks. Again, really makes some customers subsidize others and you'd think people (other than me) would be annoyed at this.

But yet, virtually every grocery store does this. Anyone know why? Does the fossil fuel industry somehow encourage this?

1
Text post (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This is a text post

83
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I have a vague idea to create a wiki for politics-related data. Basically, I'm annoyed with how low-effort, entirely un-researched content dominates modern politics. I think a big part of the problem is that modern political figures use social media platforms that are hostile to context and citing sources.

So my idea for a solution is to create a wiki where original research is not just allowed but encouraged. For example, you could have an article that's a breakdown of the relative costs to society of private vs public transportation, with calculations and sources and tables and whatnot. It wouldn't exactly be an argument, but all the data you'd need to make one. And like wikipedia, anyone can edit it, allowing otherwise massive research tasks to be broken up.

The problem is - who creates a wiki nowadays? It feels like getting such a site and community up and running would be hopeless in a landscape dominated by social media. Will this be a pointless waste of time? Is there a more modern way to do this? All thoughts welcome.

view more: next ›

rsuri

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF