[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I mostly donate w Bitcoin

Aren't there better coins with better privacy (which might be a helpful property , because being known as a generous person might make you a attractive target to charity scams attempts) and also much lower fees (monero? nano? , which reportedly has no fees) and faster transactions times? (if we are using digital currencies, we might as well try to support the best project by using it).

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Lets be realistic, companies won't want to make it open source because they think it will lead to a loss of revenue (there is a mindset of "never work for free"). openttd basically led to loss of revenue because now that there is a open source version (even the assets got re-implemented) people that are playing that are not playing proprietary games (including the proprietary original version).

You might argue there is no significant loss, but i don't think you can prove that especially to the people who own the companies which include pension fund managers who only care about the profits because if they will underperform people will go to some other pension fund or invest in other stuff like real estate.

A source available license is a more realistic option , You get the source code and permission to improve it but still have to pay something to run the game.

21
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
77
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
304
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
42
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
104
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

the monthly active users count didn't really seen such a drastic drop, seem like something disappointed lemmy most devoted supporters , i didn't notice a drop so big in such a short amount of time. there was also an increase in users after the initial surge of users in july due to the API drama. so i think the cooling down is over.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

openhub defines it as "moderately active".

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

might be worth mentioning the c910 core this SBC is based is open source.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's good to see enhancement in moderations tools , there was a lot of feedback on that so i am happy this is being worked on.

With that said donations seem at a all time low (3,524), lower then when the new website started reporting donations ($3,962). on june 2 it was €4,010 , could the lemmy.ml censorship drama be related to this? maybe there is a way to mitigate this event?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

fediverse observer shows no growth (actually it shows a continual decline), could it be threads?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It shows "blocked" but clicking on it works for me.

8
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
24
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
35
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Some of them are paid , they get donation money , and also from the NLNET iirc (which is tax payer money iirc).

Anyway this isn't how you handle feedback , there is a reason wikipedia has a guideline called assume good faith , because if you are not assuming good faith you are probably assuming bad faith and that makes it difficult for an organisation to function for obvious reasons.

19
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

source available can allow a lot of things including modification of the source code (and in particular adding quality of life improvements and updating the code to run on modern platforms). Some restrictions like not allowing selling or even not allowing competition (for example allowing the game engine to run only the original game , or disallowing the removal of monetization).

If you look at openage (age of empires 2 reimplementation) the game is not playable 25 years after release and that game is considered a classic, we could lose a lot of very good games or software.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

He is locked in California, a fairly progressive and leftist state i think , I am not entirely certain all that therapy is a good thing, i think i watched a documentary saying that psychopaths only learn from therapy how to be better manipulators and i feel like he sounds like psychopath even now.

With that said if he gets out of prison i think he should be allowed to participate in FOSS (when someone reviews his contributions), i can't help but wonder if his reportedly unhinged behavior on the kernel mailing list was handled better (e.g. mandating he will go to therapy) the murder would not have happened.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I would argue that even having a project as source available is better then closed source and can still be pretty good, look at for example the FreeSpace 2 Source Code Project.

If anybody want to ask a game creator to make a game open source and he refuses, suggesting a source available license might still be a good idea.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

wiki_me

joined 4 years ago