this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
445 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3843 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This tells you how far our government has fallen. This is literally the definition of revenge porn, using these pictures to intimidate, humiliate, and embarrass both Hunter Biden and his father. This woman should have been immediately dragged out of the House in handcuffs and charged with too many federal and state charges for me to count.

This isn't a political stunt. There were multiple crimes committed here. If Hunter Biden somehow stumbled upon MTG in similarly embarrassing photos and started publishing them all over Twitter, she'd be screaming about the weaponization of government by the Biden crime family and demanding that Hunter be immediately sent to Gitmo.

This is a new low, even for the GOP. Even for MTG. But sadly, it shouldn't be surprising. The entire GOP is on a gleeful race to the bottom to see who can out-crazy who. MTG is a national embarrassment.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

While I respect the sentiment, Charles Sumner was once beaten within an inch of their life on the floor of Congress for delivering a scathing abolitionist speech.

We're not quite at our lowest point yet, but it is scary how close we are coming.

https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/The_Caning_of_Senator_Charles_Sumner.htm

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that you had to go back almost two centuries to find an example of someone worse says all that needs to be said.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Literally back to right before the civil war lmao

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

His attacker resigned and was immediately reelected, as well as gifted more canes with which to beat Sumner.

Fuck fascists. They will never change.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

All y’all will get me 100 Nazi scalps, taken from the heads of 100 dead Nazis…or you will die tryin.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

"Let's treat them with kid gloves, that worked out well last time!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

A cane with his fucking face on it too.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Should have been removed years ago. What a disgrace.

She's yet another reason why we need regular psych evals for people in office. You should be mentally fit to hold the position.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately while that sounds great in theory, practically speaking any like kind of restriction can be weaponized by bad actors to disqualify opposition. Who defines "mentally fit"?

If explicitly standardized, who sets the standard? How does the standard get ratified? Can that standard be "gamed"?

If deferred to some official, who appoints that official? What stops them from declaring as unfit anyone who doesn't agree with their personal politics?

Common sense ideas like this break down when you try to figure out how to actually implement then without causing even bigger problems. If political history has taught us anything, it is the foolishness inherent in expecting political officials to execute their duties in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Too true, unfortunately. We'd end up with witch trials immediately, and I could see someone like MTG leading the charge!