this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
63 points (89.9% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As the previous, pretty weak.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whatever you need to tell yourself to downplay your complicity 🤷

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While totally ignoring your own complicity. Well done.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How the fuck am I complicit in a genocide I roundly condemn at every opportunity??

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your agnst drives stupidity. So you take a totally valid criticism of a candidate who lost and make it all about your current Cause célèbre, one which you are aware of only on a surface level. Why you think I would have any interest in that I do not know, yet here we are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your agnst drives stupidity

Bold words from someone too worked up and/or stupid to do even cursory proofreading on his reflexive insistence on alternative facts 🙄

totally valid criticism of a candidate who lost

Based on what, other than the word of an unregistered foreign agent trying to overcorrect with the "I'm for the locals!" demagoguery?

your current Cause célèbre one which you are aware of only on a surface level.

Says a lot about you that you automatically assume that people only care about the most heinous of crimes against humanity because it's "trending right now" and are utterly ignorant if they don't agree with the right wing establishment orthodoxy.

I've been advocating for Palestine independence since before the Oslo Accords, dumbass.

Why you think I would have any interest in that I do not know, yet here we are.

Now that you mention it, you DO strike me as extremely incurious and thus susceptible to deep seated confirmation bias. Better not waste any more time on your willfully ignorant ass.

Have the day you deserve.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Again, I'm really not interested in your jabber. You can repeat as many times as you wish, but that will not improve that fact.