this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
509 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4735 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris stopped her fans from getting too wild with their Trump bashing at a campaign rally in Wisconsin on Wednesday.

On the second day of her battleground blitz with running mate Tim Walz, when she got to the point in her now-familiar stump speech about her days prosecuting predators, fraudsters and scammers, supporters, like those in Philadelphia on Tuesday, were just starting to chant “lock him up” when Harris deviated from the script.

“Well, hold on,” she said, holding out her hand as if to placate the crowd in Eau Claire, Wisc. “You know what, the courts are going to handle that part of it. What we’re gonna do is beat him in November.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 121 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Rolling my fucking eyes at the notion that it is 'Trumpian' to call for someone to be locked up when they have publicly incited an attack on Congress to disrupt an election.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not how the rule of law works. Presidents don't lock people up*, and that's what's "Trumpian" about it. That's quite clear to me.

To equivocate however, the idea that the courts are currently equipped to deliver justice is laughable. Judge Cannon is a clear partisan with too little judicial experience to handle a case like his. The supreme court has been ratfucked since god knows when. I would love to hear her say more about the need for judicial reforms and strengthening the plumbing of our democracy against when we inevitably have to flush another turd this size.

*Except obviously Gitmo needs to be stopped finally, ffs

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait, can Trump get sent there first? After he dies of "suicide" in prison like his pal Epstein, then we can close it down.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

As much as I harbour for him the most intense ill will it is possible for a sane man to keep, I am not satisfied that authoritarianism can be cured with more of the same.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I literally wouldn't subject my worst enemy to that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Exactly. How tragic would it be to see a man poisoned to the core by hatred, only to poison oneself with hatred also?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Bro, just trust me. Just one more dissident purge and we’ll have a perfect society, bro

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’d much rather he live 5 or 10 years in abject humiliation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Wait so can this be like the stocks of yore? We can all throw old food and garbage at him while he gabbles at us in his chains?

[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 months ago

I think they mean the action of shouting it at a political rally to drive emotion, fear, and anger. Very trumpian.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago

Calling for someone who commits crimes to be locked up is absolutely fine and good.

Calling on a political leader to make that happen is not.

"Lock him/her up" has a very specific history in this context. It was Trump promising that as president he would pervert the normal course of justice to attack his political opponents. That's how dictatorships work, not democracies.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

And also already a convicted felon. Let’s not forget that.