this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
373 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

5182 readers
2086 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Can you explain what you mean? True AI? Like AGI or something else?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

They want Jane from Speaker for the Dead, they're going to get Skynet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True AI is a sentient program that can be creative and evolve it's own programming. Think digital human analoge, but it knows everything and is easily confused.

Current AI is a party trick performed by a search engine that phrases results in a conversation or a random data generator that can have a theme that informs a comprehensible image.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

True AI is a sentient program that can be creative and evolve it’s own programming. Think digital human analoge, but it knows everything and is easily confused.

We'll achieve fusion as an energy source before we develop what you're describing. If they're trying to get in on the ground floor that's pretty funny.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

everyone has a different idea of what true ai will be

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

AI isn't a very good descriptor, it's a catch all for a bunch of different tech. The media does a pretty poor job making that point so people are left to come to their own conclusions about what AI actually is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

aaeven just a machine learning model capable of searching for information and accurately returning an answer with a list of references supporting the claims would be huge for many industries and individuals.

it could help replace customer service with a competent replacement (if the company actually spent the effort to provide necessary features to the customer ui), search through software documentation to help programmers, and hopefully be a better version of what google was.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

LLMs are kinda, sorta there already, aren't they?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yes and no. They can do the job but they are too easily tricked and too quick to hallucinate to be able to reliably do the job.

Compared to a human after 8 hours of continuous customer support, you're going to have far more errors of a much greater variety and risk with any current llm models compared to any human that isn't actively attempting to destroy your company