this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
98 points (92.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2349 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We've had some trouble recently with posts from aggregator links like Google Amp, MSN, and Yahoo.

We're now requiring links go to the OG source, and not a conduit.

In an example like this, it can give the wrong attribution to the MBFC bot, and can give a more or less reliable rating than the original source, but it also makes it harder to run down duplicates.

So anything not linked to the original source, but is stuck on Google Amp, MSN, Yahoo, etc. will be removed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Can we please just get rid of the propaganda bot instead? It's bad at what it claims to do, and does nothing to stem the flow of disinformation here.

If you really want users to think about their sources, then you should have a dedicated source discussion thread for every post.

The bot actively and objectively makes Lemmy a worse platform. I've personally stopped recommending Lemmy to friends, and the bot is the top reason. (The other reason is the power users who astroturf the various news communities with their pet issues. Hopefully that will change after the election.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the reason you don’t recommend Lemmy is a bot that you can block if you don’t like it? That seems a little much, IMO

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I guess I’m confused. Why don’t you just block it? What offends you about it so much that you not only don’t want to see it, you don’t want anyone else to see it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know how I can tell someone is full of bullshit. When they start claiming they’re talking for everyone. From the comment you linked to:

show callous indifference to how everyone in the community sees it…

That’s patently untrue and weakens every argument you have about it. The funniest thing to me about all the anti-botters is that you all never bother to come up with a suggestion on how to improve it or change how it’s implemented. It’s this knee jerk emotional reaction that you then spend paragraphs rationalizing to each other.

Within the constraints we have with Lemmy as the platform it is, the options for mods are limited for now. How do you propose addressing the issues that the bot attempts to solve if you get rid of the bot?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Scintillating conversationalist! Great, so you’re one of the only folks I’ve seen step forward with help. Still doesn’t change the fact you claim to be speaking for “everyone” when you, in fact, do not speak for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Apology accepted. Have a good one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuck me for caring about this platform, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

So you seem really angry about something and I was literally just asking for clarification on why you felt the way you did. Sorry for taking an interest

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For a second I thought you were talking about our favorite high-traffic poster, who is now queue flooding 15 articles a day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Which one? There's a bunch of them. Although I suspect that a lot of them are the same people using alt accounts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A dedicated source discussion thread for every post would have to be automated and, ideally, link to a source that checks the bias and credibility of the source...

You just suggested what we're already doing...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

People can link their own sources. There could be a dedicated community to keep track. Literally anything is better than the half-assed bot telling everyone what to think.

[–] aniki 4 points 1 month ago

Your opinion is bad.