this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
120 points (96.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13601 readers
645 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Disclaimer since based on my last comment i know the accusation is coming: i voted for claudia already. I think socialists should vote for Claudia if shes available.

I just also think voting is not the ultimate expression of politics and doesnt mean that much. The "its an endorsement" thing is true, but one extra endorsement does not equal one extra dead Palestinian. Thats just magical thinking. (Also, ive tried telling people the endorsement thing because its what changed my mind about lesser evilism, it doesnt work.)

And the idea that every Kamala voter is horrific evil when many are scared, propagandized, gaslit marginalized people doing what they think they need to do to not die is misguided. You guys claim to be the ultimate propaganda understanders but dont seem to understand its power. Are people still responsible for their actions? Sure. Does a vote of all things matter as an action all that much? Lmao fuck no. Its basically pointless.

Like ive actually talked to liberals about their vote. I didnt even have to touch grass to it! Where their coming from is wrong and ive told them that, but ive seen the effect the lesser evilism propaganda has on their mind. they are not coming from a place of evil with their choice Hating, "not forgiving", or throwing in the pit (as ive seriosly seen suggested) the 10s of millions of people who will vote Kamala in November is simply not practical. You cant hate humanity to that extent and organize. And you definitly cant desire to kill that many people lmao.

Also, most of you are ex liberals. Meaning most of you have endorsed war crimes with a vote. Probably worth keeping in mind.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i-think-that I think that the primary contradiction of Hexbear is grass touching vs non-grass-touching and the openly inflammatory stance and ivory tower browbeating attitude towards anyone who is perceived to land on the opposite side of that dialectic is Very Good

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that the primary contradiction of Hexbear is grass touching vs non-grass-touching

There's a blurry line of performative grass touching that makes that contradiction hard to read sometimes, which is "the person I disagree with and don't like must touch grass which will banish their bad opinions," which is technically if temporarily true because if that magic phrase worked, the bad opinion haver becomes absent for a time.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

/srs That's exactly my point, if you're on this site you're already not touching grass lol. The fact that a huge number of our struggle sessions are based on that contradiction is ridiculous because being on this site already proves you're way more online than you seem to think you are.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh, I see now.

Yeah, whenever "touch grass" is said as a thought terminating cliche it's almost always from another power user that just wants to stand alone on top of posting hill.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A certain mod on chapo gave me a temp ban with "touch grass" before deleting not only my posts in the thread, but unrelated posts I made that day because I lost my patience with them wanting to shoot people over property.

Much easier to stand on the hill instead of doing the self-crit about why there was a need to kill strangers or how that rhetoric results in kids getting shot because they rang the wrong doorbell.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Okay this is my last comment in this thread, I swear. It almost doesn't count, it's just an addendum to my own comment really sweat

I agree. It's kinda comical how we can objectively mock the "I depicted myself as the chad and you as the soyjack" tendencies of other online forums, but then immediately revert to "I have depicted myself as the grass toucher and you as the online weirdo" arguments. It's the worst when people start listing their leftist credentials (at least one of our mods is heavily active in organising lots of direct action stuff, so it's not like being online has lots of correlations to being able or unable to do other stuff.)
There's been quite a few discussions related to this tendency. Early chapo had a group of users who were miffed at the crass tendencies of the website, because it ruined what they saw as fertile grounds for organizing more serious things. It was from this group the "we need to distance ourselves from chapotraphouse" idea came from, as far as I am aware anyway.
Personally I don't really see the website as anything super serious. The biggest potential it has is as agitprop and I think it would be cool if it could grow in size and influence, but I don't think that has a lot of relation to wether or not we have a comm called chapotraphouse... This got away from me, I forgot to take my ADHD meds this morning. I hope this was somewhat coherent.