this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
494 points (92.0% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The poll found 50% of Democrats approve of how Biden has navigated the conflict while 46% disapprove — and the two groups diverge substantially in their views of U.S. support for Israel. Biden’s support on the issue among Democrats is down slightly from August, as an AP-NORC poll conducted then found that 57% of Democrats approved of his handling of the conflict and 40% disapproved.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Yes, but you see... That doesn't matter. Trump would've done it, claimed to be the whole supplier, and his believers would eat it up.

Furthermore, the Christian religious nuts would LOVE that because it'd get them soooo much closer to their twisted appocalypse. Insane Christians (and that is WAY more than any Christian would ever admit to) WANT to see, "a blinding light rise in the east" and yadda yadda...

Doomsday cult is not a joke. These people LITERALLY want the world to end just so they can justify their sick fairy tales and feel special.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This also explains why they don't care about the environment. They believe it literally doesn't matter and Jesus will come and fix it all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It really is that simple. I've seen it from the inside.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yep! Even on a smaller scale, they don't think about things because it's just all part of god's plan. Religion is quite literally a mental virus that reduces someones' ability to think.

Faith is required to live sanely since no one can learn everything. The problem arises when they (always) use faith instead of rationalization. Religious people view rationalization as if its root word isn't "reason". As if its only definitions are the shortcut idiot ones. They replace rationalization with faith, which in many cases, results in them completely ignoring fact in favor of fantasy.

Religion is literally mind poison, training people to favor what they want to be true over what is factually true. It should surprise no one that intolerant extremists come from all religions.

And as I hinted: faith is intrinsic to human experience. Even many atheists still use faith in place of reason (just look at any atheist tankie), and many people use faith outside of spirituality. The problem arises when you use faith to justify things instead of reason, and ALL religion teaches faith over reasoning.

Religion is literally thought cancer. It distracts and eats up your mental resources until your logical brain dies and you beleive anything an authority says so long as you have faith in that authority. Religion is literally the devil as described by their own religion.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rationalising things kind of demonstrates dogma as much as a religious faith would though so you're basically just complaining about religious nutters

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, rationalizing's FIRST definition is using logic and reasoning to understand things. You are doing the same thing as religious nutters by treating "rational" as if its main root word AND first definition are literally the opposite of what they are.

Rationalizing is ONLY bad IF you are taking shortcuts and making assumptions. You are choosing to completely and utterly miss the entire point that religion produces the mental justifications for the bad kind of rationalizing. Religion trains people to dismiss using logic and accept easy answers.

Stop doing the same thing against religion. Stop dismissing analysis just because nutters exist. The nutters aren't the only ones doing utterly stupid things like ignoring climate change and cheering on religious apartheid in Israel and the US.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If the would all just get lifted up into heaven I'd be so damn happy

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Some members of the GOP genuinely do seek to trigger the end of the world. They are, however, a small minority.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yes but what about second nukes?