politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Trump certainly demonstrated his own competence in that speech, didn't he?
Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.
And he was fucking elected after that. Christ.
I heard that particular copypasta was notoriously difficult for translators to translate into other languages due to how completely incoherent it was.
I believe this is what "[sic]" is for.
His speech would look like the SSX Tricky announcer. Sic! Sic! Sic! Tight! Tight! Tight!
I mean, that's what we English speakers (Trump's allegedly first (only?) language) have to do, so why should the French be any different?
Make the French suffer. Got it.
I am not at all surprised.
You're obviously a paid shill misquoting Trump. There's no way he would put any punctuation in that ramble
Someone was arguing on Reddit that Trump was a great public speaker back in 2020. This was while Trump was saying Biden is too old and can't talk. I took no stance and just quoted that entire speech.
I'm not going back to Reddit to find out exactly what he replied, but I remember it was unhinged and uncomplimentary towards both myself and my lineage. This dude was big mad, but at least he didn't try to defend that speech.
I love how this copy pasta has parenthesis in it. Like the whole thing isn't some sort of error riddled nested jumble of parentheticals.
Top level discussion: nuclear technology in global political. First level aside: my uncle is really smart. Second level aside: conservatives are judged to be stupid. Return to top level discussion of geopolitics. Return to the first level aside to complete the idea that the smart uncle taught him about nuclear technology. New first level aside on a specific prisoner trade. Second level aside on how women are smarter "now" than men. Return to the first level aside on how we lost out on the prisoner trade.
🤷
My head hurts after reading that.
Only to the "facts should matter" crowd. Other audiences come up with their own interpretations, regardless. :-|
Yeah, but those others would believe him if he claimed that Biden was a platypus.
PLATYPUS 2024
~~No they wouldn't~~, which doesn't matter bc they'd actually go along with it regardless, thus making no functional difference whatsoever.
They do what they are told, no matter how nonsensical it may seem, even to themselves.
Exactly. So I'm not thinking about them. I'm thinking about the sliver of people who can be swayed either way that will end up deciding this election.
Good call.
I'm not sure anyone is even thinking about the candidates themselves at all anymore. Same for Harris & Biden - both sides have given up on a "good" and especially "popular" candidate. The entire focus is now on what we - both sides - can extract from them. Zero thought given to a situation like if Russia were to send nukes in the air and a decision has to be made within seconds, who's going to try to wake up the octogenarian to ask them what should be done? Well all know that someone else will be making the real calls, and we're giving up choosing directly who that will be.
So for like 80-90% of us, the masks are off: we already know that we will just pick a "side", bc that's all that we are allowed to do. Those very few people in the middle though... yeah that's going to be interesting, to see what they do. I think even most of them will end up picking a "side" rather than a candidate by the end of it all, but we'll see.