this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
916 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the best thing they've done since they named me person of the year 2006

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

https://archive.md/YAcVM

archived article if you're curious, I haven't gotten to it, its probably shit

[–] [email protected] 41 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Not gonna lie, the John Foster Dulles name-drop made me do a spit take. This author has gotta be one of those old as fuck Kissinger types. Let's check his Wikipedia:

In Patient Zero (2003) and Narcotic Culture (2004), Dikötter posits that the impact of the prohibition of opium on the Chinese people led to greater harm than the effects of the drug itself.

what-the-hell

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago

Every “China watcher” is a satanically racist imperialist

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago

What the fuck, lmao

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

prohibition of drugs in the countries i'm familiar with has been worse than the drugs shrug-outta-hecks

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And those prohibitions didn't even result in Britain invading, which can't have been good for anyone's health

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

to be fair to my mom's musical taste the war on drugs didn't ramp up until after that period

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

There's zero chance this guy applies the anti-prohobition argument to the imperial core

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't a bad read. It's full of drum beating about china being authoritarian and how they're preventing "ordinary people" from changing the country (ordinary to Time Magazine means millionaires and billionaires), but aside from those two issues it essentially reads as a description anyone here would make of China's reform and opening up being a clever trick that used capitalist power in socialist hands.

It's basically the ML take on China except with anti-china framing to make it palatable for liberal ears.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

It's actually been very odd how many normies I've explained this to at work or whatever and the response been 'ohhhh, that makes sense. Good for them, they really bamboozled these guys'