this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
140 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13395 readers
1059 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Wtf are "noncombat troops"?

[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 months ago

Troops in an """"""advisory"""""" and """"""training"""""" role stationed close to the front line who could of course defend themselves in the event of attack,

[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 months ago

Military Advisors janet-wink

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago

Troops not involved in combat? Death to Canada, but it's a perfectly plausible thing to say. Medics, engineers, etc.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

They’re going do the same shit as the reddit volunteers, where every reddit-logo mercenary was claiming to be a “medic.”

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

Our superior recon tells Ukraine where to shoot boom boom we supply them with. Therefore bullshit we didn't "pull the trigger".

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

Plausible deniability

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

little green men

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

Sacrificial lambs perhaps

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

a convenient excuse to escalate

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

We should not for a second believe "oh we're not going to send anybody who'd directly harm anyone," but I believe most military personnel do not directly fight. Support/logistics needs are immense.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Combat troops with extra steps