this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
201 points (95.5% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3638 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You can say you accept them. Good luck getting the actual People and clergy to actually do it

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

I lived in a small town pre-pandemic and was surprised the church had a rainbow sticker on their door. What they also had a smug congregation who during church brunches would go "I don't care about their lifestyle but why do they gotta shove it in my face?"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Context: All the congregations that refused started leaving the UMC in 2019.

The decision was unanimous because the bigots schismed the church, the largest religious schism in American history.

So, yes, the remaining churches will accept them. The ones that didn't already left. Expect to hear good things from them under the label of the Global Methodists.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Schism incoming in 3… 2…

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Already underway. The last time this stuff was voted on it was very narrowly blocked. I think a lot of the more conservative leaning churches saw the writing on the wall and have been leaving and set up the Global Methodist Church as a replacement organization. I seem to recall nearly a quarter of Methodist churches in the US have left the UMC.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Not underway, happened. The decision this time was unanimous because the dissenting members had left.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

They've been working on this for years, an opportunity to schism gracefully was offered in advance. In the UK, they've allowed individual congregations to decide what can happen in their church building(s), and individual clergy to opt out of officiating.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Lutherans in the basement: "Welcome to the potluck!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago