this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
840 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3776 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.li/asM5c

A Texas woman has been charged with threatening to kill the judge overseeing a criminal case against Donald Trump.

Abigail Jo Shry, 43, allegedly called US District Judge Tanya Chutkan a “stupid slave” and used another racial slur in a voicemail message she left at the Washington courthouse.

She is reported to have said: “You are in our sights, we want to kill you... If Trump doesn’t get elected in 2024, we are coming to kill you, so tread lightly, b----.

“You will be targeted personally, publicly, your family, all of it.”

The article also includes an expectation meeting mugshot. For people that talk about violence, I’ve never been less intimidated.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 161 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, now do the same to the turds threatening violence to the jurors

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m sure they will. It just takes a little time to drive all the way out to bumblefuck and figure out which cousin was using the trailer park communal Commodore 64 at the time.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t disparage the Commodore 64. It was actually a TI-99/4a.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

A TI-99/4. The extra "a" at the end was too expensive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 141 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republican officials, even after the insurrection, are using violent rhetoric. This is deliberate. They want the crazies from their party to engage in terrorism.

This is a party who wouldn't even impeach and remove Trump after a violent coup.

It's insanity that we're not treating these people like the full-blown fascists they keep showing us they are.

That entire party needs to be purged from every level of government.

People who still call themselves Republicans after the coup are a disgrace. They are traitors.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Republican officials, even after the insurrection, are using violent rhetoric.

Stochastic terrorism.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My favorite part,

"The 43-year-old said she had no intention of going to Washington to carry out her threats, before adding: “If Shelia Jackson Lee comes to Alvin [a city in Texas], then we need to worry.”"

How fucking stupid can you be to say this AFTER you've been arrested?

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

30% of Republicans believe violence may be necessary to "save" the country.

They legitimately don't think it's an issue to threaten violence against anyone who impedes Donald Trump. In their deluded minds, he's an innocent victim who only wants what's best for the country and all these evil judges and persecutors and federal employees are trying to take him down and literally destroy the country.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is what you get when you allow people with power and influence lie all the time

Yes, we need freedom of speech, blah.

You don't have true freedom of speech, not even in the US, this article literally shows that

We need more restrictions on speech. If you're a politician and you obviously lie then you need to be at least called out on that, and be forced to correct yourself publicly. Maybe some naming and shaming will make politicians slightly more honest.

All politicians lie up to some point and it's been tolerable and tolerated for a long time but Trump weaponised disinformation and lying. This needs to stop, those in power need to be held accountable. If you're the president and you startte spouting proven conspiracy theories then you need to either be forced to correct yourself and say you were staying dishonest information or you need to leave.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Freedom of speech, but not freedom from consequences of said speech. If you go and say some ish then you better be able to handle the consequences of saying the things you're saying.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

They've been doubling down on stupid their whole life.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

How fucking stupid can you be to say this AFTER you've been arrested?

Well given what she was arrested for, I can safely assume that thinking is not her strong suit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure it's necessary to question the intelligence of anyone who is part of the Trump cult. That question answers itself.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Always good to see these dumbasses ruin their lives for some old racist grifter who wouldn't even piss on them if they were on fire.

I don't know how he managed to get a following of millions of people he openly hates, but somehow he has.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They hate everyone who isn't exactly like them, Trump has a similar level of entitlement and narcissism that they do, which is why they support him - because it's just another way to support themselves.

Narcissists live vicariously through Trump, because he's proven all you have to be to succeed is an entitled piece of shit (and wealthy) - which is the only quality they possess (minus the wealth).

When you're that level of narcissist, you don't actually care about the people around you, you only care that they agree with you. Which is probably why they wouldn't care if Trump low-key hates them, because they absolutely hate anyone below them on their social hierarchy, but they hate them less if they kiss the hierarchy ring.

When they have a Trump Rambo flag, it's actually them on the flag - Trump's face is just the unifying figure for their collective personality disorders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

I'm going to prison for an NFT salesman

--far right scumbag and unite the right organizer Baked Alaska, on being sentenced to prison for his participation in 01/06, yet another right wing rally in which people died

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I'd say it's the same mental gymnastics as anyone who defends billionaire corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why would they let a woman who threatened to kill a judge oversee trump’s criminal case?

(Sorry. Had to be done)

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

ah, the ol' lemmy switch-a-roo.

EDIT: as it turns out, comment links are completely and utterly broken at the moment. sorry! the switch-a-roo chain will eventually work.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hold my recycled habits from Reddit, I'm going in!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

They just had to add the word “is” after “woman” and it would’ve made perfect sense, but news article titles always need to be maximally confusing

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I was seriously confused for a second.. Grammar matters.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The scary thing is she probably has zero regrets and would do it again.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m sure Fox is already adding her to their lineup

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

How's she gonna manage a job at Fox while simultaneously being in Congress?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

It says she’s been jailed 30 times so that’s probably a pretty accurate statement

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My favorite part is that we have to specify which criminal case in which Donald J Trump is a defendant we’re talking about because there’s THREE OF THEM.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

(Not mine): This is only the fourth time in the history of the United States that a former president has been indicted.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That’s what you get when you skip watching the news for a single day. Indictments come at you fast.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Pretty much the face I'd expect of someone who would do this.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow, that's a rough looking 43

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

This is conservatism when it starts to lose

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Remember folks, it's not okay to (jokingly) threaten violence against things like the NRA convention or the Vatican. Please save your violent threats for judges and jury members of your favorite criminally-charged politicians. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

But remember everyone, it's not a cult!!!! /s

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How much meth do you think she's smoked? I don't need an exact amount... when you make your estimate, feel free to round up to the nearest ton.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

At least 3 catalytic converters worth

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

METH? A few tons.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As much as I hate to admit it, these willfully ignorant racist fucks won't stop until they get another war.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They won't get a war, they will get jail time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

These choads haven’t getting over the whuppin’ they got from the last one. Make sure we hold their head in the toilet bowl for the full 3 minutes this time

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I mean calling a federal judge stupid when you're making material threats on a recorded line... just saying.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Quick, let's just slap her on the wrists with 2 weeks of probation and then wonder why more of this will continue to happen.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Master race you say? Hm…

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do yous measure the distance between her eyes in inches, feet, or washing machines?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›