this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
273 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4333 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump is an immediate existential threat, as he was for the Million Americans who perished from COVID over two years due to a purposefully sandbagged and almost entirely useless pandemic response. Climate it really important, but there are more important things, and climate is not a winner trying to get the Christofascists to NOT vote for the Orange Hitler

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I rabidly disagree that there is any more important topic than climate change. If you have read the actual studies and data about it, you would agree with me. If it is not addressed in a timely manner (read: a decade ago, but better late than never) there will be billions dead WITHIN YOUR LIFETIME.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

good thing neither US party wants to deal with it quickly! :(

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Almost all of the local press in swing states failed to cover Trump's corrupt offer to oil executives.

The problem isn't "people think something else is important" — it's mostly that nobody hears about the big issue in the first place because the press is covering other issues.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It not one or the other — there's a relationship between the lack of coverage, and people not being concerned.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It seems like news also used to cover issues that were important, that people should care more about, even if they don’t.

Then we had Jon Stewart to cover (in the context of comedy) important news that News didn’t bother with

Now we have nothing

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

spoilersdfsaf

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some people just can't focus on two things, even if you can.

Like, people keep pretending Biden is some climate activist...

He blew straight past Trump's record fossil fuels production records and set his own.

And sure, less domestic use sounds good, but it would actually be better than shipping coal across the globe using fossil fuels before burning the coal.

I don't know if it's long term effects of COVID or what, but these last few years I'm constantly overestimating people.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not his fault that there is a significant portion of the planet that is, in fact, quite dumb. It doesn't make them worth less as humans, but it is something that needs to be considered.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't reducing anyone and I don't think the person you were responding to was either. Some people have a harder time focusing on many things at once than others. In the same way that many many people have no internal voice in their head with which they think, people's brains work differently. It's just a fact. Some are more efficient at parsing large quantities of varied data than others. That is also a fact. I'm not trying to devalue those who cannot do that, but it would be immature and irresponsible to not consider that when looking for the causes of miscommunication or misunderstandings about how society actually functions just because you think it might hurt someone's feelings if they were told that about themselves.

To be quite honest, prioritizing climate change is the responsible and rational thing to do because if we fuck that up, literally nothing else we have done will have any meaning, whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

spoilersdfsaf

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Quit using marginalized people as human shields to defend shitty politics and their shitty policy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

spoilersdfsaf

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

just heard a blurb from him about ending electric car subsidies on day one and his crowd cheered.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

They only cheer for things that cause harm. The louder a conservative cheers, the more deadly the news.

Conservatism is a cancer that will kill us all if it is not stopped.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Bunch of zombies

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Haven't ev makers just raised prices by whatever the subsidy amount is? So not like that actually affects the masses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

nope. usual supply and demand at play. same as you won't pay more if they have an idea that you can pay more. The salesman may try but ultimately the price is the same.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There is a strange, substantive vacuum in this campaign cycle.

Yeah, almost like people are focusing on comparatively piddly bullshit on one side and ignoring mountains of terrible on the other, because ya gotta keep the horse race going, and because you gotta make the worst of one side equal to the best on the other. Even when they're still leagues apart.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

The Republican party is burning political capital in Congress so that Congress doesn't conduct a 14a3 vote to remove the disqualification from office clouding Trump's candidacy. The trials are a red herring. Our options are status quo or acceleration and it turns out the fascists have been greasing the wheels of American politicians for years.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Donald Trump sat down with oil executives and told them that if he wins, he’ll scrap a slew of President Biden’s clean energy and other environmental regulations they don’t like — as long as they raise $1 billion for him.

The response?

Crickets.

Trump’s pay-for-play move was frequently described as “transactional.” The right word is “corrupt.”


The original article contains 56 words, the summary contains 56 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The bot appears to have failed to parse most of the article.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It's been having issues recently

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

spoilersdfsaf

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I figured it was a given. If Trump gets elected, climate change accelerates. Does anyone think any different?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There are so many things to finish "corrupt anti-_______ agenda" phrase. It's about time Americans stop voting for single issues.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Americans just need to vote. Low turnout historically results in Republican Presidents.

Inaction is action.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Exactly. Unfortunately even with that being all the republican party has the Dems can't seem to care enough to beat it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The US military is one of the worlds largest polluters. Biden has spent 10x more money on the military than climate change initiatives. Speaking concern about climate change, than doing little to mitigate it sounds anti climate to me.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Sure, shrinking the Army with an ever expanding military budget.

This is 1 location out of nearly 1000 military bases and facilities, all of which still remain to be the worlds largest polluter.