48
"Abstinence" is an appropriate word here, but it did make me do a mental double-take imagining what drugs required you not to have sex.
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
48 points (98.0% liked)
politics
18651 readers
3952 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I thought the same thing at first lol. Like, woah woah woah.
This is a more compassionate approach. The idea of all or nothing puts a lot of pressure on someone when they're trying to change. The flip side is that many people can't moderate and any amount of substance can make them spiral, but start with something that helps them feel the encouragement of others even if they falter from their goals.
The path to sobriety isn't cut and dry, and this approach will help reduce the shame that's often felt along the way. Shame can lead people right back into the same patterns that got them where they are. The dehumanizing stigmas don't go unseen by the people they're applied to. Those stigmas become internalized and self deprecating in a very hurtful way. We're our own worst enemies.
Imo expecting someone who's done drugs to quit and never do it again, is one of the dumbest, most bone-headed things anyone has ever come up with. Like, shit man, drugs are awesome. Yeah, they can seriously fuck you up if you get addicted, and some drugs are extremely addictive. However, expecting someone to toss all those crazy experiences, the good and the bad, into the trash and never, ever even be tempted to pick up drugs again is... stupid. It assumes that drugs only create bad experiences, but that obviously isn't true because even the most non-physically-addictive drugs can become addictive with the right environmental factors. So obviously people aren't doing drugs just because they're addictive, they're doing them because they're fun, or because they give you an escape. As such, imo, it's better to teach people how to use drugs in moderation than to try and attempt total abstinence. Unless their body is so fucked up from drug use that they literally can't do drugs without risking death, you should be teaching them how to use them in moderation; like as a reward for getting a promotion. That sorta thing.
We can't teach people to critically think about the shape of the god damned globe and you want them to self-moderate on drugs? You ask far too much.
I think addicts doing less drugs is so fucking obvious, even to them, that the ones capable of moderation are probably mostly already doing it. Millions of us moderate our use of alcohol. But other millions fail to.
When it works, great, but I don't think people capable of moderation are what anyone is talking about when talking about addicts.
That's not how any of this works. People with substance use disorders use drugs because their brains have literally changed from drug use, not just because "they're fun". People in later stages of addiction aren't having much fun, they're barely surviving. If we could just teach them to use moderately, that would be amazing.
In an ideal world we'd get people to stop using drugs entirely. Unfortunately, that's a tough goal to reach for many people. So we try to get them to use less, or differently (eg smoking instead of IV), so that they're less likely to die.