this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
115 points (90.8% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3593 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is fucking dark...but very possible. Everyone needs to fucking vote against this prick and his cronies. He won't live another cycle anyway.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

If they change how the government works, they won’t need him anymore anyways.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Additionally terrifying repercussions of abstaining are the down-ballot effects. There are 33 Senate seats on this November’s ballot. If Trump wins due to Democrats abstaining, Republicans will likely control Congress too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, I’m not sure it’s dark enough. I genuinely do think this is only scratching the surface.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Agreed. I could see him and his disgusting underlings trying to exact revenge on all blue areas in general, and very specific citizens in particular. There is mention of trying to use military force in Democratically controlled cities, but if that is allowed to happen, we are in very, very dangerous territory and that's likely to be the spark that sets off much worse things. Remember - they wanted to punish blue areas during a fucking pandemic and dole out things like ventilators based on loyalty to the annoying orange.

Also when it comes to punishing entire sets of people, I believe donnie and his team were thinking that covid would impact urban (read: POC and Democratic) areas more so than the rural (read: white cons) areas and so their concern about covid was tempered by that. So sad it did not work out quite that way, but they seemed to have their hopes up.

Then there is the targeting journalists for prosecution thing - we should not forget that he wanted to be able to do something about SNL making fun of him - if he's allowed to do this to journalists, we are well and truly fucked and we are basically Putin's Russia at that point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think there’s a lot of naïveté out there amongst democrats. They don’t realize the stakes and are unwilling to take the necessary measures.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Look what’s happening all over the world. All over Europe, South America, Asia, North America…all over the world the far right is surging in popularity. I can’t remember which historian said it, but they pointed out that humans seem to go through a cycle every 60-80 years of electing fascists. We’re back in that period and it’s bad. This is much, much bigger than the democrats dropping the ball.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People keep acting like if we defeat him this election we are safe. Trump isn't the mastermind behind all these horrible policy changes. He didn't write "Project 2025". He is just the populist figurehead. The GOP has gone off the deepend and very election cycle will just be another chance for them to implement their BS. In the mean time congress will delay progress until they get their chance in the WH again.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The difference is republican voters gargle his balls to an extent I've never seen, not even with Regan. The whole thing about being able to shoot someone on fifth avenue might be the truest thing he's ever said.

What this means is, with the help of a willing Congress he can do anything. Even things previous republican presidents couldn't without losing support for themselves and their lackeys in Congress. Republicans in purple districts couldn't pass just anything and expect to get reelected, but with Trump taking the lead you hardly even hear about individual representatives so they're willing to vote for some crazy shit.

He can feed them shit and call it caviar all day, every day. Republican voters will eat it up and never question it no matter how much it harms them.

Republicans always do this to some extent, but usually there is a limit.

Trump has no limits.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I disagree: it took me years, but finally I understood that it'll take him a few years to go from "I'm dictator" to "I'M DICTATOR".

That process is an identity-remaking.

There will be literal human-sacrifice after a few years, but not at the beginning.

I hope I'm wrong, but .. certain I'm right, on this point.

_ /\ _

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I agree it will take him some time, maybe not quite as much as you think, but my point was I don't think anyone else could even get there. Even Regan had limits in what the faithful would put up with, he wasn't teflon. But no matter what Trump does, the MAGAts will support him and the moderate republicans, if there is such a thing anymore, will go along to avoid earning their wrath.

There is only one caveat I can think of. Trump can do anything without losing MAGAt support, but he can't say anything. There have been scattered instances of Trump saying something that deviated from the MAGA ethos and actually getting booed. He can still do the things that would get him booed but say he's doing the exact opposite and those morons will never question it. He just has to keep assuring his cult he's hurting the people they hate.

As long as he keeps tossing red meat to those hateful scumbags by abusing our most vulnerable fellow citizens and increasing oppressive efforts on other groups they hate, they will cheer any and every thing he does even as they're being herded into forced labor ghettos.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I feel like there's a chance - not good odds, mind you - but a chance that America ends up sanctioned and diplomatically isolated.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Exactly what "America first" idiots want (but not actually, because they're stupid).

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's like the Brexit folks that wanted the benefits of the EU and short lines at the airport but what they got was fucked and didn't seem to understand why. "This isn't the Brexit I voted for!". Yes it is.

"He's not hurting the right people!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Nice username 👏

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Like the other person said: who could sanction the US? Without us military presence China and Russia could bully the rest of the world. What's happening in Ukraine and the South China Sea but in overdrive.

Tanking the us economy means the us might get desperate and the US really only has one lever that works on everyone: force.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Meh, least of our concerns. I wouldn’t be surprised of putin moved on Alaska and trump said “yes, daddy, it feels so good!”.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

All his idiotic cult would pivot immediately, too - "Alaska was too woke anyway", "we didn't really need it anyhow", etc....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

By who exactly? We are moving toward permanent tri-polar authoritarianism: China, Russia, and the United States. Nobody is coming to save us with "sanctions". We already lost the war. It's fucking over. People just haven't come to terms with that reality yet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

we? already lost what war?

you think Russia today is top 3 global power? by what metric?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The blyats can’t even manage a war of aggression on their own border.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Let's just ignore the literal fascist government take over and mass deportation (to Africa??? Who the fuck will pay for that??? Cus the world's poorest countries sure as hell won't!).

But like, his great strategy to fix the US economy is to FUCKING SANCTION IT SELF?!? Oh yea! Let's show China! They'll be in real hot water once NOBODY IS DOING BUSINESS WITH THE US, BUT IS FORCED TO CHOSE SOMEONE ELSE!!! And then he wants to overspend on excessive policing, great mix.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

You gotta remember that he’s putin’s bitch. This all makes perfect sense.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Indeed.

Thanks Merrick.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This should be shared as a response to every far left clown that posts here suggesting that people not vote.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I suspect that a lot of those (especially on Instagram and other more popular socials) are right wing astroturf

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I do think a lot are exactly that. Though I know a few types (IRL) that are the perfect embodiment of the horse shoe theory come to life - people so intent on proving themselves somehow so perfect and so smart that they'll work themselves into a frenzy to even voting for donnie to really stick it to "the centrists" or whatever.

So when I see them online doing the same sort of thing I see some current/former associates do, I believe at least some really do hold these absurdist positions.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm mostly surprised the NYT is the one publishing this. It's read more like a capitalist shill rag trying to play both sides for at least a decade. Never taking the shots it needed to at the right even when there were facts to do so and not editorials/opinions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

They're playing a game of access journalism, where they do puff pieces to gain access to wealth and power, and value that over pretty much anything else.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I thought the same thing.