this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
445 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden doesn't care about wet people

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay I'm not trying to defend Fox here, but it seems like this was a joke.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But will their viewers know that?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

And therein lies the rub.

[–] Ubermeisters 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk what’s with the downvotes. Maybe people can’t do without a /s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh well, it is what it is, guess I'll add the /s

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Or they need some supporting evidence for the "we're entertainment, not news" argument at trial.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course Biden is in league with... Hillary

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or redrawing the path with sharpie?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This is too easy. Big water... Ocean water

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

IF I YOUR FAVORITE PRESIDENT TRUMP was in this situation NOW I would LITERALLY WRITE AN AI that HACKS the JEWISH SPACE LASERS SPONSORED by FAUX FAUCI and made THEM DESTROY the hurricane with 8K ULTRA PRESISON believe ME I'VE seen them they're the WORST lasers EVER SEEN but my HACK that was made by ME and the BEST team they're good guys! Very fine people! would have made them STRONG enough TO DESTROY THE HURRICANE. Meanwhile DeSanctimonious who is a BAD man and many of the BEST PEOPEL are saying it! is in BED with BIDEN and the DEEP STATE to STEER the hurricane to KILL my voters! It's true! They LITERALLY called the HURRICANE Hillary! It's the WORST hurricane believe me! I've seen it myself and ALL the GOOD people say it's the WORST! DON'T TRUST THEM! Vote TRUMP 2024 and stay safe!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait this isn't an Onion post...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I refuse boing boing as a reputable news source lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The onion has been dead for a long time, how can you satire the news when the news is batshit crazy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I bet Trump’s wall would have stopped it. Take that liberals

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nah, Trump would just have drawn a different path with his Sharpie. Problem solved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Would have tried to nuke it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Had a prolonged laughflash right after reading the headline. Then it dawned on me: Some stupid fucks watching fox are actually going to believe this nonsense :-(

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It’s kind of an obvious joke about the border and immigration. The storm made landfall in Mexico and is now moving into the US. Conservatives think Biden just lets everyone in Mexico come over the border, so that’s the joke. Meanwhile liberals are laughing because they take it literally and think conservatives believe a storm can be detained. Come on folks. You need to be able to get a joke that was crafted for someone else or you are really stuck in your perspective.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a joke but it's a really low quality one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All the pieces to the joke are there but Fox proved yet again that conservatives suck at comedy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah the work of joke writing is taking those pieces and assembling them together in a way that makes it funny.

But you know what they say: lazy, entitled conservatives just don't want to do the work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. It’s what’s called a cheap shot.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

It's hard to tell since the last time the republican party was in charge the leader of the party seriously thought you could just nuke a hurricane so I would not be surprised if the viewers of fox actually do blame Biden and think you can detain a hurricane

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Bruh this is the party of "Jewish space lasers"

It's hard to hear anything they say as coming from the mouth of anything other than a 4 year old

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

You realize Fox News has said crazier shit that weren't jokes? Remember when FN called Jamie Lee Curtis for being a hypocrite when it comes to gun control and she wielded a gun in a movie?

Honestly, it's hard to tell when they're "joking". I think it's far more likely they just throw shit against the wall and see what sticks. Sure, many publications do that, but no outlet does it more disingenuously than FN. I'm not willing to give that network the benefit of a doubt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Either they’re serious, and that’s bad, or they made a joke that wasn’t funny, which is also bad. I’ll roll my eyes either way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

So appropriate to joke about natural disasters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If so, it's a really bad joke. Faux news has said equally crazy things.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He didn't even bring them paper towels!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Biden is not to blame for the hurricane or any natural disaster.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Yeah he is. He could have just changed the path of the storm with a Sharpie like Great Lord Trump, Bringer of Rains.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If Biden had finished Trump's wall it would have put Hilary in jail.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Have they tried using hunter biden’s dick pics to stop it?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not the rain that's the problem with Hilary; it's the emails.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Buttery Males slipped right in!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Well they were good and lubricated for the task

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Lock her-icane up?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Canada the RW/Kremlin trolls blame our PM for the fires. Same deal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least that has a thin veneer of plausibility. Technically, Trudeau could personally setting fires purposely, in that any person could set a fire in multiple locations across the country. Expecting someone to be able to stop a hurricane from entering the country is a whole new level of trolling.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both are ridiculous and have ZERO plausibility.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, both are ridiculous. But setting a fire is a lot more plausible than stopping a hurricane.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's NOT plausible to suggest my PM is setting fires.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Yes, of course, in reality it is not plausible that the prime minister of Canada is purposely setting wildfires. However, it is more plausible that Trudeau could physically set a fire than Biden could stop a hurricane. That's the only point I was making.